Sathyabhama v. Sarojini Amma
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAVI
WEDNESDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF MAY 2023 / 3RD JYAISHTA, 1945
RSA NO. 229 OF 2005
(AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE OF THE II ADDITIONAL DISTRICT
COURT, PALAKKAD
IN A.S. NO.349/2001 DATED 02.11.04 AND OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF
COURT PALAKKAD IN O.S NO.282/1999)
APPELLANT/2ND RESPONDENT/3RD DEFENDANT:
SATHYABHAMA, D/O.KORU, KANNAMPURATH VEEDU, CHERAYA DESOM, KONGAD, PALAKKAD.
BY ADVS. SRI.RENJITH THAMPAN SMT.P.A.ANITHA
RESPONDENTS/APPELLANTS AND RESPONDENTS 1&2/
PLAINTIFF & DEFENDANTS 1 AND 2:
1 SAROJINI AMMA W/O.PADMANABHAN NAIR, KOORAMKUNNATHU HOUSE, THRIPPALAMUNDA, PARASSERY, KONGAD, PALAKKAD.
BY ADVS. SMT.K.AMMINIKUTTY SRI.N.RAGHURAJ SRI.A.V.RAVI
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24.05.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
RSA NO. 229 OF 2005
2
T.R.RAVI, J.
RSA No.229 of 2005
Dated this the 24thday of May, 2023
JUDGMENT
This Court had directed the appellant to take steps for
impleading the legal representatives of the deceased 1st
respondent, who was the plaintiff in OS.No.282/1999. More
than one year and three months have elapsed and still no
steps have been taken. The appeal itself has abated against
the 1st respondent.
In such circumstances, this appeal is dismissed for non
prosecution.
Sd/-
T.R.RAVI
JUDGE
sn
SATHYABHAMA, D/O.KORU
SAROJINI AMMA W/O.PADMANABHAN NAIR AND THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR AND THE TAHSILDAR
TRAVI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court