Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Unnikrishnan M.S Vs T.K.Jose — Kerala HC (2023) — LawSathi Research

Home
Kerala HC
2023
Unnikrishnan M.S Vs T.K.JoseUnnikrishnan M.S v. T.K.Jose

Dismissed

Unnikrishnan M.S v. T.K.Jose

Kerala HC24 Feb 2023Con.Case(C)/644/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought closure of a contempt of court case by asserting compliance with prior directions, resulting in dismissal.

What did the court decide?

No further relief or penalties imposed as case closed.

What the court decided

AI extract

A

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN

FRIDAY, THE 24^TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2023 / 5TH PHALGUNA, 1944

CON.CASE(C) NO. 644 OF 2022

AGAINST THE ORDER IN WP(C) 3546/2022 DATED 02.02.2022

PETITIONERS:

1 SRI.UNNIKRISHNAN M.S AGED 40 YEARS S/O. LATE SATHYADEV, KANJIRAPADATH HOUSE, NAVODAYA NORTH, VADACODE P.O, ERNAKULAM 682 023

BY ADVS. A.J.RIYAS BEENA JOSEPH (B-859) SARITHA THOMAS

RESPONDENTS:

1 SRI.T.K.JOSE (AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) NOW WORKING AS ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 001

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
SRI.UNNIKRISHNAN M.S
respondent
SRI.T.K.JOSE
respondent
SRI JAFAR A.M
respondent
SRI.ANIM CHERIAN

Coram

AI extract

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Kerala HC
Decided on: 24 Feb 2023 · February
Registered: 24 Mar 2022
Case no.: Con.Case(C)/644/2022

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from Murali Purushothaman

Confident Projects Residential Represented by Its Managing Partner Vs the Principal Secretary to Government
23 Feb 2023
C.S.Varkey Vs the District Collector
23 Feb 2023
St.Augustine Church Vs a.N.Ani
22 Feb 2023
Joesph P.T Vs Nitto Baby
24 Feb 2023

Cite this judgement

Unnikrishnan M.S v. T.K.Jose, Con.Case(C)/644/2022 (KL), decided on 24 February 2023.

The High Court of Kerala publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN

Parties & counsel

Outcome

No further relief or penalties imposed as case closed.

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

High Court dismissed the contempt proceeding upon acceptance of petitioner's affirmation that all directions in the earlier writ order had been followed.

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

2 SRI JAFAR A.M (AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) NOW WORKING AS THE DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF TREASURIES, KERALA KRISHNA BUILDING, NEAR MUSIC COLLEGE, OPP. GANDHI BHAVAN, GANDHI BHAVAN ROAD, THYCAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 014

3 SRI.ANIM CHERIAN (AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) NOW WORKING AS THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL, INDIAN AUDIT AND ACCOUNTS DEPARTMENT, OFFICE OF THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL (A AND E), M.G ROAD, P.B NO. 5607, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 001 R BY GP SRI.JOBY JOSEPH

THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24.02.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

CON.CASE(C) NO. 644 OF 2022 ..2..

JUDGMENT

When this matter came up for further consideration

today, it is submitted by the learned Counsel for the petitioner, as well as the learned Government Pleader that the directions in Annexure-A1 judgment dated 02.02.2022 has been complied with. Accordingly, the contempt of court case (civil) is closed.

Sd/MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN JUDGE

SB/24/02/2023

CON.CASE(C) NO. 644 OF 2022 ..3..

APPENDIX

PETITIONER ANNEXURES

Annexure A1 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 2-02-2022 IN W.P(C)NO. 3546/2022

MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN

CNR

KLHC010198122022

Bench

Murali Purushothaman

Disposal

CLOSED

Shahulhameed a Vs Mr.P.R.Sumesh

24 Feb 2023

M/S Signify Innovations Limited Represented by Authorized Person Mr. Neeraj Metha Vs M/S Lulu International Shopping Mall Private Limited Represented by Its Managing Director

24 Feb 2023