Joesph P.T v. Nitto Baby
Case brief
What is this about?
This is a contempt order closing a case after the respondent filed an affidavit producing a revised order complying with the previous judgment's direction to pass final orders under Section 235W(3) of the Kerala Panchayat Raj Act, 1994.
What did the court decide?
Contempt of court case closed due to compliance with judicial directions by the production of a revised order.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN
FRIDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2023 / 5TH PHALGUNA, 1944
CON.CASE(C) NO. 103 OF 2023
AGAINST THE ORDER IN WP(C) 33222/2022 DATED 13.12.2022
PETITIONER:
JOESPH P.T, AGED 78 YEARS S/O THOMAN, PARAPADAN HOUSE. BASLEHAM, THIRUMUDIKUNNU KARUKUTY .P.O ERNAKULAM 683576, PIN - 683576
BY ADV BIJU.P.N.
RESPONDENT:
NITTO BABY
(AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) THE SECRETARY, KARUKUTTY GRAMA PANCHAYATH . KARUKUTTY P.O. ERNAKULAM 683576
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
JOESPH P.T
- respondent
NITTO BABY
Coram
MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court