George Pathrose v. Vishnu Raj. P. IAS
Case brief
What is this about?
In this contempt of court case, counsel submitted that the directions from the previous judgment in W.P.(C) No.18231/2022 dated 06.06.2022 were complied with. The court recorded the submission and closed the case.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH
FRIDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF JULY 2023 / 30TH ASHADHA, 1945
CON.CASE(C) NO. 168 OF 2023
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENTWP(C) 18231/2022 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
PETITIONERS:
1GEORGE PATHROSE
AGED 61 YEARS
S/O. PATHROSE, ALUKKA HOUSE, KALADY P.O., ALUVA,
ERNAKULAM, PIN - 683574
2JOHNY V. I.
AGED 57 YEARS
S/O. ITTICHAN, VARAPUZHAKKARAN HOUSE, NEELESHWARAM P.O.,
ALUVA, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 683574
BY ADV ARYA UNNIKRISHNAN
RESPONDENTS:
VISHNU RAJ. P. IAS
(AGE AND FATHER'S NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER),
THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER,
REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICE, K B JACOB ROAD, FORT KOCHI,
ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682001
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
George Pathrose and Johny V. I.
- respondent
Vishnu Raj. P. IAS and Sr.GP - Smt. K.M. Reshmi
Coram
N. Nagaresh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court