Zeenath M.S. v. Rajeev Kumar Chaudhary
Kerala HCCon.Case(C)/548/2022
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The Court closed contempt proceedings after the respondent filed a memo confirming the rejection of Form 5 in the underlying W.P. No. 22003/2021.
What the court decided
AI extract
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
¶2
PRESENT
¶3
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN
¶4
MONDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF JANUARY 2023 / 19TH POUSHA, 1944
¶5
CON.CASE(C) NO. 548 OF 2022
¶6
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENTWP(C) 22003/2021 OF HIGH COURT OF
¶7
KERALA
¶8
PETITIONER/PETITIONER:
¶9
ZEENATH M.S.
AGED 66 YEARS
W/O.ZAINUDHEEN, NEW MANZIL, PALLICKACHIRA KAVALA,
PAIPPAD, KOTTAYAM - 686 537.
¶10
BY ADV C.Y.VINOD KUMAR
¶11
RESPONDENT/3RD RESPONDENT:
¶12
RAJEEV KUMAR CHAUDHARY
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
ZEENATH M.S.
- respondent
RAJEEV KUMAR CHAUDHARY
Coram
AI extract
MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court