A single-paragraph order closing a contempt case after the petitioner submitted that the directions issued in the underlying writ petition had been complied with.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAVI
MONDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2023 / 27TH AGRAHAYANA, 1945
CON.CASE(C) NO. 2782 OF 2023
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 36378/2023 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
PETITIONER/PETITIONER:
AROANE DYNELL SEQUEIRA
AGED 21 YEARS
S/O. DR. STEPHEN SEQUEIRA NA BELLA COTTAGE,
PRASANTHI NAGAR ROAD NO. 4, EDAPPALLY PO
ERNAKULAM, PIN – 682 024
BY ADVS.
SADCHITH.P.KURUP
C.P.ANIL RAJ
SIVA SURESH
RESHMA RAJ
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS:
1DR. BIJOY V.M
PRINCIPAL-IN-CHARGE
ST. ALBERTS COLLEGE (AUTONOMOUS)
BANERJI ROAD, ERNAKULAM, PIN – 682 018
2DR. LIZZY MATHEW
CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS ST. ALBERTS COLLEGE
(AUTONOMOUS) BANERJI ROAD, ERNAKULAM, PIN – 682 018
SRI. SHERRY J. THAOMAS
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR
ADMISSION ON 18.12.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
CON.CASE(C) NO. 2782 OF 2023
2
T.R.RAVI.J
------------------------------------------------------Contempt Case (C). No.2782 of 2023
in
WP(C) No.36378 of 2023
Dated this the 18th day of December, 2023
JUDGMENT
When the case is taken up, it is submitted that the
directions in the judgment have been complied with.
The contempt case is hence closed.
Sd/-
T.R.RAVI
JUDGE
sn
CON.CASE(C) NO. 2782 OF 2023
3
APPENDIX OF CON.CASE(C) 2782/2023
PETITIONER’S ANNEXURE
Annexure A1
CERTIFIED COPY OF JUDGMENT IN WPC 36738/2023
DATED14/11/2023
RESPONDENT’S EXHIBITS : NIL
//TRUE COPY// PA TO JUDGE
Aroane Dynell Sequeira
Dr. Bijoys V.M.
Dr. Lizzy Mathew
Sherry J. Thomas
T.R. Ravii
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court