Govindan Potti. S, v. Sri.Suresh Baby
Case brief
What is this about?
In a contempt case under Section 12, the High Court of Kerala closed the proceedings without adjudicating the merits of the petitioner's claim. The court directed the EPFO to reconsider the petitioner's entitlement to a higher pension in light of the Supreme Court judgment in Employees Provident Fund Organisation v. Sunil Kumar B. (2022).
What did the court decide?
Contempt Case is closed without prejudice to the EPFO's right to reconsider the petitioner's entitlement for disbursement of higher pension.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANIL K. NARENDRAN
&
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE SOPHY THOMAS
FRIDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2023 / 14TH ASWINA, 1945
CON.CASE(C) NO. 2606OF 2019
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 12.10.2018 IN WP(C)NO.34955 OF
2016 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
PETITIONER/PETITIONER NO.4:
GOVINDAN POTTI. S, AGED 57 YEARS
S/O.SAMBHU POTTI, STAFF NO.920, ITI LIMITED,
KANJIKODE (W)-P.O., PALAKKAD, PIN- 678 623,
PF A/C.NO.KRKKD00040390000000714,
UAN.NO.100321634558, RESIDING AT SREEPADAM,
ANJALI LINE, PALLIPPURAM P.O., PALAKKAD.
BY ADV P.N.MOHANAN
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the Contempt Case should be closed in light of the Apex Court's 2022 judgment allowing reconsideration of pension entitlement.
Whether the respondent EPFO is required to reconsider the petitioner's claim for higher pension based on recent Supreme Court directives.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Govindan Potti. S
- respondent
Suresh Baby
- respondent
Nita N.S
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court