Raveendran Nair v. Vinod Raj
Case brief
What is this about?
This is a contempt of court case filed for alleged non-compliance of an earlier order dated 29.03.2022. The respondent, a Sub Divisional Magistrate, informed the court through the Public Prosecutor that the order had been complied with and communicated to the petitioner. The court accepted this submission and closed the case.
What did the court decide?
The contempt of court case was closed as the court's direction had been complied with.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A.
WEDNESDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF JULY 2023 / 21ST ASHADHA, 1945
CON.CASE(C) NO. 1113 OF 2023
AGAINST THE ORDER IN Crl.MC 8839/2018 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
PETITIONER:
RAVEENDRAN NAIR
AGED 60 YEARS
S/O. KESAVAN NAIR,
SAYANTHANAM HOUSE, OPPOSITE POOR BOY'S HOME,
KANJIKUZHY P.O.,
MUTTAMBALAM VILLAGE,
KOTTAYAM TALUK,
KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. PIN - 686 004.
BY ADVS.
S.RANJIT (K/250/1999)
GOKUL DAS V.V.H.
RESPONDENT:
VINOD RAJ
FATHER'S NAME AND AGE (NOT KNOWN TO THE
PETITIONER), SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE,
KOTTAYAM, MINI CIVIL STATION,
KOTTAYAM P.O.,
KOTTAYAM DISTRICT- 686 001.
OTHER PRESENT:
ADV. SREEJA.V, SR.GP
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to relief for non-compliance of the order dated 29.03.2022.
Whether the contempt case should be closed based on the submission of compliance by the public prosecutor.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
RAVEENDRAN NAIR
- respondent
VINOD RAJ
Coram
ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court