The High Court of Kerala closed an open contempt of court case (COC 1088/2023) as no order challenging the judgment in the underlying writ petition survived for consideration upon the government pleader's production of the compliance order.
Contempt of court case closed; nothing survives for consideration.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED NIAS C.P.
THURSDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF JUNE 2023 / 11TH JYAISHTA, 1945 CON.CASE(C) NO. 1088 OF 2023
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 14629/2023 OF HIGH COURT
OF KERALA
PETITIONER/S:
JAIS MARY JOSEPH P. AGED 55 YEARS W/O. JOHNSON K. RAPHAEL, H.S.T. (MATHS), LOURDE MATHA HIGH SCHOOL, MANGALAM DAM, MANGALAM DAM P.O., PALAKKAD, PIN - 678706 BY ADVS. P.MOHANDAS (ERNAKULAM) K.SUDHINKUMAR SABU PULLAN GOKUL D. SUDHAKARAN R.BHASKARA KRISHNAN K.P.SATHEESAN (SR.)
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENT 1 & 3:
1 RANI GEORGE I.A.S. AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, SECRETARY, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695001 2 SRI. MANIKANDAN AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER (IN CHARGE), OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, CIVIL STATION, PALAKKAD, PIN – 678001 BY SR.GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.VINITHA.B
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01.06.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
COC 1088 OF 2023
2
MOHAMMED NIAS. C.P.,J
CO(C) No.1088 of 2023
Dated this the 1st day of June, 2023
JUDGMENT
Learned Government Pleader produces the order dated 31.5.2023 issued by the Government in terms of the judgment of this Court dated 5.5.2023. In the light of the above nothing survives for consideration in this contempt of court case. Without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to challenge the order, if so advised, the contempt of court case is closed.
Sd/-MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., JUDGE
dlk/1.6.2023
COC 1088 OF 2023
3
APPENDIX OF CON.CASE(C) 1088/2023
PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES
Annexure-I CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 5-52023 IN W.P.(C)NO. 14629/2023
Jais Mary Joseph P.
Rani George I.A.S.
Sri. Manikandan
Mohammed Nias C.P.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
