Biju Thomas v. Registrar of Companies
Case brief
What is this about?
In this writ petition, the petitioner challenged an order striking off his company under Section 248 of the Companies Act, 2013, alleging violation of the right to representation. The Court held that the appellate authority under Section 252 could address this plea and closed the writ petition.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition dismissed in principle; liberty granted to raise contentions in the appeal under Section 252 of the Companies Act, 2013.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.G.ARUN
THURSDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF JUNE 2022 / 2ND ASHADHA, 1944
WP(C) NO. 9024 OF 2022
PETITIONER/S:
BIJU THOMAS
AGED 49 YEARS, MANAGING DIRECTOR, M/S SUVAN TECHNOLOGY
SOLUTIONS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITE, 17/2464, DOVE TOWER,
ANJIKKATH ROAD, CSEZ (P.O.), KAKKANAD, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI
– 682037, RESIDING AT F4 & 5, TRAVANCORE RESIDENCY,
MANGATTU ROAD, BEHIND MODERN BREAD, EDAPPALLY (P.O),
ERNAKULAM, KOCHI - 682024
BY ADVS.
GAJENDRA SINGH RAJPUROHIT
AKHIL GEORGE
THANSEELA M.B.
RESPONDENT/S:
REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES
OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES, 1ST FLOOR,
COMPANY LAW BHAVAN, BMC ROAD, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI - 682021
BY ADV Girish Kumar V
OTHER PRESENT:
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition challenging the striking off order under Section 248 can be disposed of regarding the lack of representation opportunity, given the appellate remedy under Section 252.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Biju Thomas
- respondent
Registrar of Companies
Coram
V.G. Arun
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court