Vimitha Vijayan, v. State of Kerala
Case brief
What is this about?
A writ concerning the recovery of maternity leave benefits admittedly availed by the petitioner while she was employed by KSRTC. The court held that impugned orders imposing recovery are unsustainable at the current stage since the resignation was accepted retroactively without a proper enquiry.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition allowed; Impugned order Ext. P19 set aside; Competent Authority directed to reconsider claim and date of resignation after hearing petitioner; Recovery actions deferred.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
THURSDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2022 / 19TH KARTHIKA,
1944
WP(C) NO. 8288 OF 2021
PETITIONER:
VIMITHA VIJAYAN,
AGED 35 YEARS
W/O / AGHILES, OFFICE ATTENDANT, G.H.S.
PORUVAZHY, PORUVAZHY P.O. SATHAMCOTTAH, KOLLAM,
690 520,
RESIDING AT KANATHATTIL, KOYIKKALBHAGOM,
PERUVELIKKARA P.O. WEST KALLADA, KOLLAM, 690
891,
(FROM MALLAKATHU KIZHAKKATHIL, ARINALLOOR SOUTH
P.O. ARINALLOOR, KOLLAM 690 538).
BY ADV B.MOHANLAL
RESPONDENTS:
1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, A 695 001.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the State can recover maternity leave benefits availed by petitioner on the ground that her resignation was accepted retroactively.
Whether the KSRTC conducted a proper enquiry regarding the date of her resignation before issuing impugned orders.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
VIMITHA VIJAYAN
- respondent
STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT
- respondent
THE DIRECTOR OF GENERAL EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA
- respondent
THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION
- respondent
THE HEADMASTER, G.H.S.,PORUVAZHY
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court