Disposed

Reshmi R v. the Kulasekharapuram Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd. NO.955

Kerala HC9 Nov 2022WP(C)/6380/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This judgment in four connected writ petitions addressed whether a candidate selection for posts in a Co-operative Bank was valid when conducted by an agency lacking statutory approval on the date of the examination. The Court set aside the notification and ordered the Joint Registrar to adjudicate the validity of the selection process within three months while deferring appointments.

What did the court decide?

Notifications setting aside selection process were allowed; Joint Registrar ordered to adjudicate validity within three months; pending appointments were deferred.

Reshmi R Vs the Kulasekharapuram Service Co-Operative… — Cooperative Societies | Kerala HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN

¶4

WEDNESDAY, THE 9^TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2022 / 18TH KARTHIKA, 1944

¶5

WP(C) NO. 403 OF 2022

¶6

PETITIONERS:

¶7

1 A. SHAJAHAN AGED 54 YEARS S/O.ALIKUNJU, KOCHUKANHIKKAL, (SHAJAHAN MANZIL), ADINAD SOUTH, KATTILKADAVU P.O., KARUNGAPPALLY, KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN - 690 642 (MEMBERSHIP NO.8009).

¶8

2 S.RAJU AGED 53 YEARS S/O.SIVADASAN, ASSARIPARAMBIL (SREEMANGALATH), ADINAD SOUTH, KATTILKADAVU P.O., KARUNGAPPALLY, KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN- 690 642 (MEMBERSHIP NO.8315).

¶9

BY ADVS. N.N.SUGUNAPALAN (SR.) ABDUL SALIM M.

¶10

RESPONDENT/S:

¶11

1 KULASEKHARAPURAM SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. NO. 995 KATTILKADAVU P.O., KARUNGAPPALLY, KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN - 690 642, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.

¶12

2 REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES JAWAHAR SAHAKARANA BHAVAN, DPI JUNCTION, THYCAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 014.

¶13

3 THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF KULASEKHARAPURAM SERVICE COOPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO.995 KATTILKADAVU P.O., KARUNGAPPALLY, KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN - 690 642, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.

¶14

4 ADDL R4 ANU ASHOK, AGED 39 YEARS, S/O ASHOK KUMAR, THIRUMUTTATH BANGLOW,VALLIKKAVU, PLAPANA.P.O, KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN-690 525. (ADDITIONAL R4 IMPLEADED AS PER THE ORDER DATED 22.03.2022 IN I.A.NO.1/2022 IN WP(C)no.403/2022)

¶15

5 ADDL R5. SHINU.S, AGED 40 YEARS, S/O SUKUMARAN PILLAI, VAYALASSERY MADATHIL, ADINAD SOUTH, KATTILKADAVU POST OFFICE, KARUNGAPPALLY, KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN-690 542.

¶16

[WP(C) Nos.403/2022, 6380/2022, 13563/2022, 22611/2022] 2

¶17

(ADDITIONAL R5 IMPLEADED AS PER THE ORDER DATED 22.03.2022 IN I.A.NO.2/2022 IN WP(C)NO.403/2022)

¶18

6 ADDL. R6. THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (GENERAL), CO-OPERATIVE'S JOINT REGISTRAR'S (GENERAL) OFFICE, CIVIL STATION, KOLLAM-691 134.(ADDITIONAL R6 IMPLEADED AS PER THE ORDER DATED 09.11.2022 IN I.A.NO.4/2022 IN WP(C)NO.403/2022)

¶19

7 ADDL. R7. RAJI MOL, D/O RAVEENDRAN, RAVI NIVAS, ADINAD SOUTH, KATTILKADAVU.P.O, KARUNAGAPALLY, KOLLAM DISTRICT-690 642. (ADDITIONAL R7 IMPLEADED AS PER THE ORDER DATED 09.11.2022 IN I.A.NO.4/2022 IN WP(C)NO.403/2022)

¶20

8 ADDL. R8. ANEER, S/O POOKUNJU, PUTHENPURAYIL, K.S.PURAM.P.O, PUNNAKKULAM, KARUNAGAPALLY, KOLLAM DISTRICT-690 544.(ADDITIONAL R8 IMPLEADED AS PER THE ORDER DATED 09.11.2022 IN I.A.NO.4/2022 IN WP(C)NO.403/2022)

¶21

9 ADDL.R9. SINIMOL, D/O SUGATHAN, CHOOLUR MEENATHATHIL, ADINAD SOUTH, KATTILKADAVU.P.O, KARUNAGAPALLY, KOLLAM DISTRICT-690642.(ADDITIONAL R9 IMPLEADED AS PER THE ORDER DATED 09.11.2022 IN I.A.NO.4/2022 IN WP(C)NO.403/2022)

¶22

10 ADDL. R10. ABDUL SAMAD, S/O KHALID, KARUKUNNEL, VAVVAKKAVU.P.O, KARUNAGAPALLY, KOLLAM DISTRICT-690 528. (ADDITIONAL R10 IMPLEADED AS PER THE ORDER DATED 09.11.2022 IN I.A.NO.4/2022 IN WP(C)NO.403/2022)

¶23

BY ADVS. D.SOMASUNDARAM S.KARTHIKA HANA KARNOLIA MADONA CYRIL K.MEERA PREETHY KARUNAKARAN ANJANA M VADHYAR

¶24

SMT.RESMI THOMAS-GP

¶25

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09.11.2022, ALONG WITH WP(C).6380/2022, 13563/2022 AND CONNECTED CASES, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶26

[WP(C) Nos.403/2022, 6380/2022, 13563/2022, 22611/2022]

¶27

¶28

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶29

PRESENT

¶30

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN

¶31

WEDNESDAY, THE 9^TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2022 / 18TH KARTHIKA, 1944

¶32

WP(C) NO. 6380 OF 2022

¶33

PETITIONER:

¶34

RESHMI R, AGED 33 YEARS W/O ASHOKAN, KUMBAZHA, VAVVAKAVU P O, KARUNAGAPPALLY, KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN-690528.

¶35

BY ADVS. K.SIJU S.ABHILASH ANJANA KANNATH T.S.SREEKUTTY

¶36

RESPONDENTS:

¶37

1 THE KULASEKHARAPURAM SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD NO.955, KUTTILKADAVU P O, KARUNAGAPPALLY, KOLLAM690542., REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.

¶38

2 THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS THE KULASEKHARAPURAM SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD NO.955, KUTTILKADAVU P O, KARUNAGAPPALLY, KOLLAM690542. REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT. 3 THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (GENERAL), CO-OPERATIVE'S JOINT REGISTRAR'S (GENERAL) OFFICE, CIVIL STATION, KOLLAM-691013. 4 THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (GENERAL),A R OFFICE, KARUNAGAPALLY, KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN-691584. BY ADV D.SOMASUNDARAM SMT.RESMI THOMAS-GP

¶39

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09.11.2022, ALONG WITH WP(C).403/2022 AND CONNECTED CASES, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶40

¶41

[WP(C) Nos.403/2022, 6380/2022, 13563/2022, 22611/2022]

¶42

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶43

PRESENT

¶44

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN

¶45

WEDNESDAY, THE 9^TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2022 / 18TH KARTHIKA, 1944

¶46

WP(C) NO. 13563 OF 2022

¶47

PETITIONERS:

¶48

1 JAYAKUMAR S. AGED 39 YEARS

¶49

S/O. SREEDHARAN NAIR, PANIKKAVEETIL, VADAKKATHIL, KARUNAGAPPALLY TALUK, KOLLAM DISTRICT,PIN-690 542

¶50

2 SHAHIDA BEGUM AGED 39 YEARS W/O. NIZAM, KARUR PUTHANVEEDU, PULIYOOR VANCHI KIZHAKKU, THAZHAVA P.O., KARUNAGAPPALLY TALUK, KOLLAM DISTRICT,PIN-690 523

¶51

BY ADV S.JAYAKRISHNAN (KARUNAGAPPALLY)

¶52

RESPONDENTS:

¶53

1 KULASEKHARAPURAM SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD NO.995 KATTILKADAVU P.O., KARUNAGAPPALLY, KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN-690 642, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.

¶54

2 REGISTRAR CO OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, JAWAHAR SHANKAR BHAVAN, DPI JUNCTION, THYCAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 014

¶55

3 THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF KULASEKHARAPURAM SERVICE COOPERATIVE BANK LIMITED NO.995, KATTILKADAVU P.O., KARUNAGAPPALLY, KOLLAM DISTRICT,PIN690 642, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY

¶56

BY ADV D.SOMASUNDARAM, SMT.RESMI THOMAS-GP

¶57

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09.11.2022, ALONG WITH WP(C).403/2022 AND CONNECTED CASES, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶58

[WP(C) Nos.403/2022, 6380/2022, 13563/2022, 22611/2022]

¶59

¶60

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶61

PRESENT

¶62

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN

¶63

WEDNESDAY, THE 9^TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2022 / 18TH KARTHIKA, 1944

¶64

WP(C) NO. 22611 OF 2022

¶65

PETITIONER:

¶66

THANVEER MUHAMMED, AGED 20 YEARS S/O ABDUL VAHAB. M, PUTHUPPURAKKAL, ADINAD SOUTH, KATTILKADAVU P.O. KARUNAGAPPALLY, KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN -690642

¶67

BY ADVS. N.N.SUGUNAPALAN (SR.) ABDUL SALIM M.

¶68

RESPONDENTS:

¶69

1 KULASEKHARAPURAM SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD NO-995 KATTILKADAVUP.O, KARUNAGAPPALLY, KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN - 690642, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.

¶70

2 THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF KULASEKHARAPURAM SERVICE COOPERATIVE BANK LTD, NO. 995 KATTILKADAVU P.O, KARUNAGAPPALLY, KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN -690 642 REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT.

¶71

3 REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, JAWAHAR SAHAKARANA BHAVAN, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. PIN695014

¶72

4 THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (GENERAL), CO-OPERATIVE JOINT REGISTRAR'S (GENERAL) OFFICE, CIVIL STATION, KOLLAM -691 134.

¶73

5 ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, ASSISTANT REGISTRAR'S OFFICE, KARUNAGAPPALLY, KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN: 691 584.

¶74

BY ADV D.SOMASUNDARAM, SMT.RESMI THOMAS-GP

¶75

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09.11.2022, ALONG WITH WP(C).403/2022 AND CONNECTED CASES, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶76

[WP(C) Nos.403/2022, 6380/2022, 13563/2022, 22611/2022]

¶77

¶78

JUDGMENT

¶79

Amidst the various assertions, allegations

¶80

and averments made and urged in these writ petitions, the petitioners impel a small issue as to whether an “Outside Agency”, as per the provisions of Rule 182(5) of the Kerala Co-

¶81

operative Societies Rules (hereinafter called

¶82

“KCS” Rules for short), ought to have had recognition on the date on which they conducted the written examination for selection of candidates to the posts in a Co-operative Society.

¶83

Sri.N.N.Sugunapalan – learned Senior

¶84

Counsel, instructed by Sri.M.Abdul Salim – learned counsel for the petitioners in WP(C)No.22611/2022 and WP(C)No.403/2022,

¶85

pertinently argued that, as is evident from

¶86

Ext.P5 in WP(C)No.403/2022 and Ext.P8 in WP(C)NO.22611/2022, it is unreservedly admitted

¶87

[WP(C) Nos.403/2022, 6380/2022, 13563/2022, 22611/2022]

¶88

¶89

by the jurisdictional Joint Registrar of Cooperative Societies and by other Authority concerned that, on 15.01.2022, when the written examination was conducted by an agency by name “Institute of Co-operative Management Services”

¶90

(ICMS), they did not have approval, as statutorily mandated. The learned Senior Counsel submitted that, therefore, the entire process is vitiated; and hence prayed that the rank list, prepared consequent to the said process, be set aside and the Bank be directed to conduct examination and the selection afresh. He concluded his submissions saying that, however, in spite of his client having brought all these information to the notice of the Joint Registrar, said Authority has issued Ext.P5 in WP(C)No.403/2022, skirting the said

¶91

contention, however, conceding that “ICMS” did not have recognition on 15.01.2022.

¶92

The afore submissions of the learned

¶93

[WP(C) Nos.403/2022, 6380/2022, 13563/2022, 22611/2022] 8

¶94

Senior Counsel were fully adopted by Sri.Anjana Kannath – learned counsel for the petitioner in WP(C)NO.6380 of 2022 and by Sri.S.Jayakrishnan

¶95

– learned counsel appearing in

¶96

WP(C)No.13563/2022.

¶97

In response, however, Sri.D.Somasundaram – learned Standing Counsel for the Society, submitted that his client had taken a decision to entrust conduct of the written examination with “ICMS” on 29.10.2021 when, admittedly, they enjoyed the approval of the statutory authorities under the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act (“KCS” Act) and the Rules thereunder. He conceded that it may be true that, subsequently when the examination was conducted by them on 15.01.2022, their approval had not been renewed; but that, to the best of his client's information, such orders were issued by the competent Authority a few days thereafter. He vehemently argued that,

¶98

[WP(C) Nos.403/2022, 6380/2022, 13563/2022, 22611/2022] 9

¶99

therefore, the written test cannot be construed to be vitiated for this reason because, until the agency was told by the competent Authority that their approval cannot be granted, or it was expressly denied, they were authorised to act in terms of the earlier approval, which they were enjoying for the last several years.

¶100

It is thus obvious that the stand of

¶101

the petitioners and the Society are at

¶102

variance, as far as the legal issue whether “ICMS” could have conducted the examination on

¶103

15.01.2022, when, concededly, extension of

¶104

their approval after 01.01.2022 had not been granted by the competent Authority.

¶105

I, therefore, asked Smt.Resmi Thomas –

¶106

learned Government Pleader, about this and she admitted that the earlier approval granted to the “ICMS” was valid only until 31.12.2021 and

¶107

that it was subsequently renewed only on 18.01.2022. She, however added that, she does

¶108

[WP(C) Nos.403/2022, 6380/2022, 13563/2022, 22611/2022] 10

¶109

not have any comment on the internecine

¶110

disputes between the parties with respect to the period of 18 days when the “ICMS” did not

¶111

have a formal recognition or approval after the conduct of the written examination, but argued

¶112

that this perhaps would not be relevant on

¶113

account of the fact that said Agency was granted renewal of their approval on

¶114

18.01.2022.

¶115

The learned counsel appearing for the

¶116

party respondents in these cases, adopted the submissions of the learned Standing Counsel for the Society – Sri.D.Somasundaram, saying that their clients were found, through the process of selection, to be the most competent and suitable and thus selected for appointment.

¶117

They added that, solely on account of the interim orders in this case, his clients'

¶118

appointments have not been effected by the Society; and therefore, prayed that this writ

¶119

[WP(C) Nos.403/2022, 6380/2022, 13563/2022, 22611/2022] 11

¶120

petition be dismissed, asserting that “ICMS” was fully authorised to have conducted the examination on 15.01.2022, which is manifest from the fact that they got their approval formally extended through the order dated 18.01.2022, as submitted by the learned

¶121

Government Pleader.

¶122

When I assess and evaluate the afore rival contentions, it is evident that the

¶123

crucial issue in these cases, is whether the “ICMS” could have conducted the examination on 15.01.2022. This is because, as already seen above, their original approval was valid until 31.12.2021, but it was formally renewed only through orders dated 18.01.2022.

¶124

Therefore, the question arises as to whether it was proper on their part to have conducted an examination on 15.01.2022 and I

¶125

notice that this issue has never been

¶126

considered or evaluated by any competent

¶127

[WP(C) Nos.403/2022, 6380/2022, 13563/2022, 22611/2022] 12

¶128

Authority until now.

¶129

Sri.N.N.Sugunapalan – learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners, in Ext.P5 - produced along

¶130

¶131

dealt with this issue, but then chose not to

¶132

answer it, but recording that “ICMS” did not have approval as on 15.01.2022 – being the date of the examination.

¶133

I am, therefore, of the firm view that

¶134

this aspect will have to be evaluated and considered by the jurisdictional Joint

¶135

Registrar, adverting to the rival contentions of the parties, as also scope of law relating to the grant of approval and its renewal of

¶136

Outside Agencies, entrusted with the task of conducting the written examinations, under the

¶137

ambit of Rule 182(5) of the KCS Rules.

¶138

Resultantly, I order these writ petitions

¶139

and direct the jurisdictional Joint Registrar

¶140

[WP(C) Nos.403/2022, 6380/2022, 13563/2022, 22611/2022] 13

¶141

of Co-operative Societies to hear all the

¶142

parties and take a decision as to the validity

¶143

of the selection process conducted by the Society, adverting to the afore recorded contentions, as also to my observations above; thus culminating in an appropriate order and necessary action thereon, as expeditiously as is possible, but not later than three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

¶144

Needless to say, until such time as the

¶145

afore exercise is completed and the resultant

¶146

orders communicated to the parties, all appointments by the Bank from the rank list in question, shall stand deferred.

¶147

Sd/-

¶148

DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN JUDGE

¶149

SAS

¶150

¶151

[WP(C) Nos.403/2022, 6380/2022, 13563/2022, 22611/2022]

¶152

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 6380/2022

¶153

PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS

¶154

Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF INTERIM ORDER PASSED IN WPC NO.403/2022 BY THIS HON'BLE COURT.

¶155

Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF INTERIM ORDER DATED 3.3.2016 IN WPC NO.8162/2016 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT.

¶156

Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF COMPLAINT SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 09.01.2022.

¶157

Exhibit P4 TRUE COPY OF COMPLAINT SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER N 17.01.2022 BEFORE THE 4TH RESPONDENT.

¶158

Exhibit P5 TRUE COPY OF CIRCULAR NO.18/91 DATED 07.06.1991 ISSUED BY THE REGISTRAR OF COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES. Exhibit P6 TRUE COPY OF PROCEEDINGS DATED 20.01.2021 OF THE REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. Exhibit P7 TRUE COPY OF RANKED LIST PUBLISHED FOR THE POST OF PEON BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 28.01.2022.

¶159

[WP(C) Nos.403/2022, 6380/2022, 13563/2022, 22611/2022]

¶160

¶161

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 13563/2022

¶162

PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS

¶163

Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE PAPER PUBLICATION DATED 01.11.2021 Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF HALL TICKET OF 1ST PETITIONER Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF HALL TICKET OF 2ND PETITIONER Exhibit P4 TRUE COPY OF THE RANK LIST OF PEONS DATED 28.1.2022 PUBLISHED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT Exhibit P5 TRUE COPY OF THE RANK LIST OF DRIVER DATED 28.1.2022 PUBLISHED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT

¶164

[WP(C) Nos.403/2022, 6380/2022, 13563/2022, 22611/2022] 16

¶165

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 22611/2022

¶166

PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS

¶167

Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF INTERIM ORDER DATED 07.01.2022 PASSED IN W.P(C) NO.403/2022 BY THE HON' BLE HIGH COURT Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE INTERIM ORDER DATED 03.03.2016 PASSED IN WP(C) NO. 8162/2016. Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION ENCLOSING THE RECEIPT SHOWING THE REQUIRED FEES (RS. 300/-) REMITTED AS APPLICATION FEE DATED 10.11.2021. Exhibit P4 TRUE COPY OF THE ADMISSION TICKET BEARING NO. P-117 DATED 29.12. 2021. Exhibit P5 TRUE COPY OF COMPLAINT SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER ON 14.01.2022 BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT. Exhibit P6 TRUE COPY OF COMPLAINT SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER ON 20.01.2022 BEFORE THE 4TH RESPONDENT Exhibit P7 TRUE COPY OF CIRCULAR NO.18/91 DATED 07.06.1991 ISSUED BY THE REGISTRAR OF COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES. Exhibit P8 TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS DATED 20.01.2021 OF THE REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES. Exhibit P9 TRUE COPY OF RANKED LIST PUBLISHED FOR THE POST OF PEON BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 28.01.2022.

¶168

¶169

[WP(C) Nos.403/2022, 6380/2022, 13563/2022, 22611/2022]

¶170

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 403/2022

¶171

PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS

¶172

Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE ADVERTISEMENT PUBLISHED IN MALYALA MANORAMA DAILY DATED 02/11/2021. Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE ADVERTISEMENT PUBLISHED IN KERALA KAUMUDI DAILY DATED 09/01/2016.

¶173

Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE INTERIM ORDER IN WP(C) NO.8162/2016 DATED 03/03/2021.

¶174

RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS

¶175

Exhibit R3 A TRUE COPY OF THE RANK LIST OF PEONS AND DRIVER APPROVED BY THE BOARD

¶176

PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS

¶177

Exhibit P4A	TRUE COPY OF THE ADMIT CARD ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER / DEPONENT.
Exhibit P4 B	TRUE COPY OF THE RANKED LIST DATED 28/1/2022 TO THE POST OF PEON
Exhibit P4(b)	LIST OF A FEW NAMES OF THE APPOINTEES KNOWN TO THE PETITIONERS SHOWING THE RELATIONSHIP WITH THE BOARD MEMBERS.
Exhibit P5	TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION OF THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES DATED 19/03/2022.
Exhibit P6	TRUE COPY OF CIRCULAR NO.79/2011 DATED 09/11/2011 ISSUED BY THE REGISTRAR OF CO- OPERATIVE SOCIETIES.
Exhibit P7	TRUE COPY OF THE NEWS REGARDING THE IRREGULARITIES IN SELECTION PROCESS FOR THE APPOINTMENT IN THE BANK PUBLISHED IN "KERALA KAUMUDI DAILY" DATED 09/03/2022.

Reshmi R v. the Kulasekharapuram Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd. NO.955

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Reshmi R v. the Kulasekharapuram Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd. NO.955

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dr. Bhadrakumari S. Vs State of Kerala

Prof. (Dr) Sunny Kuriakose Vs State of Kerala

The Council of Principals of Colleges in Kerala Vs State of Kerala

A. Shajahan Vs Kulasekharapuram Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd. No. 995

The Chairman Vs Bindu Mohan N.

Jayakumar S. Vs Kulasekharapuram Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd. NO.995