Radhakrishnan Nair .C v. Union of India
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Kerala dismissed a writ petition regarding land acquisition after finding that compensation had already been paid to the petitioners. The court closed the petition, leaving claims for enhanced compensation to be approached to the competent authority.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition closed; petitioners to approach competent authority for enhanced compensation and rehabilitation.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.G.ARUN
TUESDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2022 / 17TH KARTHIKA, 1944
WP(C) NO. 79 OF 2021
PETITIONERS:
1RADHAKRISHNAN NAIR .C
AGED 58 YEARS
SON OF KUTTAN PILLAI, R.K. BUILDINGS, OPP. H.P. PETROL
PUMP, NH- 66, HARIPAD CURRENTLY STAYING AT MOHANALAYAM,
NEAR RAILWAY STATION, VETTUVENI, HARIPAD P.O. ALAPPUZHA
DISTRICT 690 514.
2SHINU.P.OOMMEN,
AGED 45 YEARS
SON OF P. KUNJUMMEN, PUTHEN PARAMBIL SHINUVILLA,,
VETTUVENI HARIPAD P.O. KARTHIKAPPALLY TALUK, ALAPPUZHA
DISTRICT, KERALA STATE REPRESENTED BY HIS POWER OF
ATTORNEY HOLDER P. KUNJUMMEN, AGED 75 YEARS, SON OF K.
PAPPY PUTHEN PARAMBIL, SHINU VILLA, VETTUVENI, HARIPAD
P.O. KARTHIKAPPALLY VILLAGE, KARTHIKAPPALLY TALUK,
ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Nair Radhakrishnan
- petitioner
Oommen Shinu P
- petitioner
Soman K
- petitioner
Pushpamma Dr. K
- respondent
Union of India
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court