The petitioner submitted that the petitions prayers are infructuous. The Court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous based on this admission at the admission stage itself.
The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP(C) NO. 7783 OF 2012
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN
THURSDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF DECEMBER 2022 / 10TH AGRAHAYANA, 1944
WP(C) NO. 7783 OF 2012
PETITIONER/S:
C.V.SASIDHARAN
CHEYLAZHIKAM HOUSE,MAYYANAD P.O.,KOLLAM DIST
BY ADVS. SRI.K.P.SUDHEER
RESPONDENT/S:
1 THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR CIVIL STATION,KOLLAM-691013
3 THE TAHSILDAR KOLLAM-691013
BY ADV SRI.C.R.SIVAKUMAR
OTHER PRESENT:
SRI.K.M.FAISAL, GP
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01.12.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C) NO. 7783 OF 2012
2
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
W.P.(C.) No. 7783 of 2012
Dated this the 1st day of December, 2022
JUDGMENT
The counsel for the petitioner submitted that the prayers
in the writ petition are infructuous.
Therefore, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
SD/-
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN JUDGE
SKS
C.V. SASIDHARAN
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR CIVIL STATION, KOLLAM
THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER KOLLAM
THE TAHSILDAR KOLLAM
THE VILLAGE OFFICE ERAVIPURAM, MAYYANAD P.O.
SHABJAHAN S/O.P. SUALIMAN KUNJU
P.V. KUNHIKRISHNAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
