P.K.Vasu v. State of Kerala
Case brief
What is this about?
The Kerala High Court, on admission, closed two writ petitions after the Government Pleader submitted that the disputed building was demolished and the establishment moved to another location, suggesting petitioners approach competent authorities for grievances.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP(C) Nos.3442 & 8438 OF 2012
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN
THURSDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF DECEMBER 2022 / 10TH AGRAHAYANA, 1944
WP(C) NO. 3442 OF 2012
PETITIONER/S:
1 P.K.VASU S/O.KARUPPANDI, PANTHAM-PADOM, PARALI-II VILLAGE,PALAKKAD.
- 2 GURUVAYOORAPPAN
- S/O.KANDU, MANALIPPADOM, KOLLENGODE VILLAGE,CHITTOOR TALUK, PALAKKAD.
- 3 SHAJI RAJESH S/O.VISWANATHAN, BALAM PARAMBU, KUTHANNOOR VILLAGE,ALATHOOR TALUK, PALAKKAD.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petitions should be allowed or closed based on the submission that the disputed building was already demolished.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
P.K.VASU and others
- respondent
STATE OF KERALA and others
Coram
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court