G. Maneesh v. State of Kerala
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court held that the petitioners' prayer to interdict the tender process became infructuous as no order was granted previously, thus closing the writ petition.
What did the court decide?
The writ petition was closed as the prayer sought became infructuous due to prior lack of order.
What the court decided
WP(C) NO. 732 OF 2018
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V THURSDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2022 / 3RD AGRAHAYANA,
1944
WP(C) NO. 732 OF 2018
PETITIONER/S:
1 G. MANEESH AGED 36 YEARS S/O. GOPALAKRISHNAN, SANTHOSH NIVAS, S.N.NAGAR,MALAMPUZHA, PALAKKAD PIN-678651
2 V.V.HUSSAIN AGED 48 YEARS,S/O. V.V.HYDER, RESIDING AT VADAKKEDATH VALAPPIL, THRITHALA, PALAKKAD PIN-679534
3 JAMSHEER AGED 31 YEARS,S/O. HAMZA, RESIDING AT NAMBIYATH HOUSE,POMBRA, PALAKKAD, PIN-678595 BY ADVS. SRI.C.S.MANU SRI.S.K.PREMRAJ
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition seeking relief regarding license stalls has become infructuous.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
G. Maneesh and others
- respondent
State of Kerala
- respondent
Secretary to the Government, Department of Water Resources
- respondent
Chief Engineer Irrigation and Administration
- respondent
Executive Engineer Irrigation Division, Malampuzha
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court