The Kerala High Court permitted withdrawal and dismissed a writ petition filed by a parcel handling contractor as infructuous on November 23, 2022.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF NOVEMBER 2022 / 2ND AGRAHAYANA, 1944
WP(C) NO. 6073 OF 2011
PETITIONER:
P.MUHAMMED KOYA PUTHIYEDATH HOUSE, PILASSERY PARAMBU, VENGERI P.O., KOZHIKODE-10. BY ADV SRI.CIBI THOMAS
RESPONDENTS:
1 SOUTHERN RAILWAY, REP;BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER, CHENNAI-600001. 2 THE SENIOR DIVISIONAL COMMERCIAL MANAGER, SOUTHERN RAILWAY, DIVISIONAL OFFICE, COMMERCIAL BRANCH,, SOUTHERN RAILWAY, PALAKKAD-678001. 3 THE DIVISIONAL RAILWAY MANAGER (COMMERCIAL), DIVISIONAL OFFICE, PALAKKAD-678001. 4 SRI.T.A.FASAL, PARCEL HANDLING CONTRACTOR, SHORNUR JUNCTION RAILWAY STATION, SHORNUR-679121. BY ADVS. SRI.BABU CHERUKARA SRI.P.A.SALIM
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23.11.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C) NO. 6073 OF 2011
2
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J.
------------------------------
W.P.(C).No. 6073 of 2011
Dated this the 23rd day of November, 2022
JUDGMENT
When this writ petition came up for consideration,
the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the matter is infructuous and the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition. Permission is granted.
Therefore, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/-
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN JUDGE
DM
P.MUHAMMED KOYA
SOUTHERN RAILWAY
SR.T.A.FASAL
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
