Marcily.P.a. v. State of Kerala
Case brief
What is this about?
The court dismissed Writ Petition (C) No. 3607 of 2012 primarily as the counsel for the petitioner submitted that the matter had become infructuous.
What did the court decide?
Petition dismissed as infructuous.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF NOVEMBER 2022 / 2ND AGRAHAYANA, 1944
WP(C) NO. 3607 OF 2012
PETITIONER:
MARCILY.P.A. AGED 65 YEARS S/O.ACHAN BAVA, PULITHARA HOUSE, BOLGATTY, MULAVUKAD P.O., ERNAKULAM DISTRICT-682504 BY ADV SRI.K.P.JUSTINE (KARIPAT)
RESPONDENTS:
1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ERNAKULAM-689630 2 THE TAHSILDAR KANAYANNUR TALUK, ERNAKULAM-689611 3 THE VILLAGE OFFICER MULAVUKAD VILLAGE, MULAVUKAD P.O., ERNAKUALM DIST, PIN-682504 4 THE LAND TRIBUNAL, ERNAKULAM, PIN-689620 5 SRI V.SESHAGIRI PAI, S/O.VENKITESWARA PAI, MANJA BHAGAVATHI LANE, NORTH CHERLAI, COCHIN-682002 (MANAGER, VELUTHA JUTHA PALLI, JEW TOWN, MATTANCHERRY, COCHIN-682002) 6 THE APPELLATE AUTHORITY (LAND TRIBUNAL) ALAPPUZHA-688004 BY ADV SRI.R.LAKSHMI NARAYAN SRI.RANJITH T.R., GP THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23.11.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Marcily P.A.
- respondent
State of Kerala
- respondent
The Tahsildar Kanayannur Taluk, Ernakulam
- respondent
The Village Officer Mulavukad Village
- respondent
The Land Tribunal, Ernakulam
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court