Dismissed

Laina Shiju v. Elamkunnapuzha Grama Panchayath

Kerala HC1 Jul 2022WP(C)/601/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court dismissed a writ petition challenging rental charge notices and a vacation notice issued by a Grama Panchayat. It held that after accepting a request to reduce penal interest and directing payment, the petitioner could not rescind the agreement and attack the proceedings for non-payment.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition was dismissed; the petitioner was informed that any paid rent amount shall be adjusted against dues.

Laina Shiju Vs Elamkunnapuzha Grama Panchayath — Contract and Commercial Disputes | Kerala HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT

¶2

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY FRIDAY, THE 1^ST DAY OF JULY 2022 / 10TH ASHADHA, 1944 WP(C) NO. 601 OF 2016

¶3

PETITIONER:

¶4

LAINA SHIJU
AGED 34 YEARS
W/O. SHIJU,
ATTIPETTI HOUSE
VELIYATHAMPARAMBU
NAYARAMBALAM POST,
VYPEEN

¶5

BY ADV. SRI.DENIZEN KOMATH

¶6

RESPONDENTS:

¶7

1 ELAMKUNNAPUZHA GRAMA PANCHAYATH, MALIPPURAM POST VYPEEN - 682 511, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.

¶8

2DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PANCHAYATS,
CIVIL STATION,
KAKKANAD
ERNAKULAM.

¶9

R1 BY ADVS.SRI.AADITHYAN S.MANNALI
 SRI.SAJAN MANNALI
R2 BY SRI. K.P. HARISH, SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER

¶10

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD
ON 01.07.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:

¶11

W.P.(C.) No. 601/2016

¶12

¶13

JUDGMENT

¶14

This writ petition is filed by the petitioner seeking the following reliefs:-

¶15

“1) Call for the entire records pertaining to the issuance of Exhibits P-3, P-6 and P-7 and Issue a Writ of Certiorari, any other Order, writ or direction to quash the same.

¶16

2) Issue a Writ of Mandamus, any other Order writ or direction, directing the 2^nd Respondent herein to hold an enquiry into Exhibit P- 5 grievance of the Petitioner, and to take appropriate decision thereon within a time frame.

¶17

3) Issue a Writ of Mandamus, any other Order, writ or direction, directing the 1^st Respondent to refund the balance of security advance obtained from this Petitioner, after deducting the rent arrears for the period covered by Exhibit P-1 agreement along with legally enforceable interest immediately.

¶18

4) Such other reliefs that this Hon’ble Court deem fit and proper to grant in the interest of justice.

¶19

5) Award costs of the proceedings.”

¶20

The petitioner is aggrieved by Exts. P3, P6

¶21

and P7 notices issued by the Elamkunnapuzha Grama Panchayat demanding rental charges for the building occupied by the petitioner for the period from 2012, December to 2013, March; 2013, April

¶22

W.P.(C.) No. 601/2016

¶23

¶24

to 2014, March; 2014, April to 2015, March; and 2015 - 2016. When petitioner received Ext. P3 notice, the petitioner has submitted Exts. P4 and P5 representations dated 21.07.2015. On receipt of the representations and at the request of the petitioner, the Panchayat has reduced the penal interest from the demand and directed the petitioner to remit the rent within five days. However, the petitioner has not complied with the same. It was thereupon that Panchayat has issued Ext.P7 notice dated 28.12.2015 directing the petitioner to vacate the premises within 24 hours enabling the Panchayat to start a homoeo clinic in the building in question. It is thus challenging the legality and correctness of the demands raised by the Panchayat, this writ petition is filed.

¶25

When the writ petition was admitted to the files of this Court, status quo was directed to be

¶26

¶27

W.P.(C.) No. 601/2016

¶28

maintained for a period of one month and thereafter, it was being periodically extended and extended until further orders on 15.06.2016 which is still in force. The Panchayat has not filed any counter to the writ petition.

¶29

I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, Smt. Mereena Joseph and perused the pleadings and material on record.

¶30

On a perusal of the demand and documents produced by the petitioner, it is clear that when the demand was received to pay the rent arrears, the petitioner has made a request to delete the penal interest from the demand. The Panchayat

¶31

acted upon the request of the petitioner, removed the penal interest and directed the petitioner to remit the amount within five days. However, the petitioner has not remitted the amount due for the four years as specified above. It was thereupon

¶32

W.P.(C.) No. 601/2016

¶33

¶34

that the Panchayat issued Ext.P7 notice directing the petitioner to vacate the premises.

¶35

On the analysis of the facts and

¶36

circumstances, I am of the considered opinion that if the petitioner has agreed to pay the demand, if the penal interest is removed from the demand notice, the petitioner cannot rescind from the same and attack the demand and other proceedings.

¶37

In that view of the matter, I do not think that the petitioner has made out any case of arbitrariness or illegality on the part of the Grama Panchayat in raising the demand and also directing the petitioner to vacate the premises. I could not also locate any arbitrariness or illegality justifiable to be interfered in a proceeding under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Therefore, the writ petition has to fail.

¶38

W.P.(C.) No. 601/2016

¶39

¶40

Accordingly, it is dismissed. However, I make it clear that if any rent amount is paid by the petitioner, the same shall be adjusted against the dues contained in the demand.

¶41

Sd/-

¶42

SHAJI P. CHALY JUDGE

¶43

DCS/01.07.2022

¶44

W.P.(C.) No. 601/2016

¶45

¶46

APPENDIX

¶47

PETITIONER EXHIBITS

¶48

Exhibit P1TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE RENTAL AGREEMENT
EXECUTED IN-BETWEEN PETITIONER AND 1ST
RESPONDENT.

¶49

Exhibit P2TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE RECEIPT OF
PAYMENT MADE BY THIS PETITIONER.

¶50

Exhibit P3TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED
FROM THE OFFICE OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT
DATED 10.06.2015.

¶51

Exhibit P4TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE COMPLAINT
PREFERRED BY THE PETITIONER DATED
21.07.2015 BEFORE 1ST RESPONDENT.

¶52

Exhibit P5TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE COMPLAINT
PREFERRED BY THE PETITIONER DATED
21.07.2015 BEFORE 2ND RESPONDENT.

¶53

Exhibit P6TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED
FROM THE OFFICE OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT
DATED 22.12.2015 VIDE RECEIPT NUMBER
A3/131/15.

¶54

Exhibit P7TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED
FROM THE OFFICE OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT
DATED 28.12.2015.

Laina Shiju v. Elamkunnapuzha Grama Panchayath

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Laina Shiju v. Elamkunnapuzha Grama Panchayath

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Zavier Vs the State of Kerala

Kunnampalli Unnikrishnan Vs the State of Kerala

Elsy Joseph Vs Laiju

Augusty Vs the State of Kerala

Abdul Rahim Vs Kozhikode Muinicipal Corporation

Rajendra Prasad Vs Kulasekharapuram Grama Panchayat