Dismissed

1. Aneesh Kumar v. Sree Kalleli Oorali Appooppankavu (Moolasthanam) Trust Represented by Managing Trustee C.v.Santha

Kerala HC23 Dec 2022WP(C)/36385/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Ernakulam held that the petitioners must approach the jurisdictional civil court for the reliefs sought. The writ petition was closed, reserving the petitioners' liberty to approach the civil court.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition is closed, reserving the petitioners' liberty to approach the jurisdictional civil court.

1. Aneesh Kumar Vs Sree Kalleli Oorali… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Kerala HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.G.ARUN

¶4

FRIDAY, THE 23^RD DAY OF DECEMBER 2022 / 2ND POUSHA, 1944

¶5

WP(C) NO. 36385 OF 2022

¶6

PETITIONERS:

¶7

1 ANEESH KUMAR AGED 57 YEARS KANNANKAVIL PATTOOR P O PADANILAM NOORNAD ALAPPUZHA KERALA PIN 690529 PIN - 690529 2 JAGADEESH N.P AGED 55 YEARS JAGADEESH BHAVAN, PAIVALLY BHAGAM, OMALLOOR P.O PATHANAMTHITTA, KERALA. PIN - 689647 3 VIJAYAN.M AGED 59 YEARS PACHETTI KONATHU VEEDU, NEDUPURAM, KOTTUKKAL, KOLLAM, KERALA PIN - 691306 4 THULASEEDHARAN AGED 56 YEARS CHANDRALAYAM, THOTTATHUMURI, KUNNATHUR, KOLLAM, KERALA, PIN - 690540 5 SUKESH.S AGED 34 YEARS KUTTIVILAKATHIL, THAMARAKULAM, ALAPPUZHA, KERALA PIN - 690530 6 SURESH.G AGED 33 YEARS NEDUVINCHERI, THAMARAKULAM, KIZHAKKUMURI, ALAPPUZHA, KERALA , PIN - 690530 7 SUNIL.T AGED 37 YEARS SUNIL VILASAM, KODUMON PO, PATHANAMTHITTA, KERALA PIN – 691555

¶8

W.P.(C).36385/2022

¶9

¶10

8 PRASAD.G AGED 37 YEARS KARIMBUVILA VEEDU, SADANANDAPURAM P.O, KOTTARAKKARA, KOLLAM, KERALA , PIN - 691531

¶11

BY ADV SANKARAN NAIR D.

¶12

RESPONDENTS:

¶13

1 SREE KALLELI OORALI APPOOPPANKAVU (MOOLASTHANAM) TRUST REPRESENTED BY MANAGING TRUSTEE C.V.SANTHA KUMAR AGED 42 YEARS KALLELY THOTTAM P.O, KONNI, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT, KERALA, PIN - 689691

¶14

2 STATE BANK OF INDIA KALLELI BRANCH, PB NO.5, AKKARAKKALA BUILDINGS, KALLELI PO, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT, KERALA- PIN-689691, PIN - 689691

¶15

OTHER PRESENT:

¶16

SC FOR R2 SANTHOSH MATHEW

¶17

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23.12.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

W.P.(C).36385/2022

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 23^rd day of December, 2022

¶22

Going by the reliefs sought, the petitioners have to approach the jurisdictional civil court rather than attempting to seek relief under Article 226.

¶23

The writ petition is closed, reserving the petitioners' liberty to approach the jurisdictional civil court.

Sd/-

V.G.ARUN

JUDGE

W.P.(C).36385/2022

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 36385/2022

¶31

PETITIONER EXHIBITS

¶32

Exhibit P1	MOA AND BYLAW OF SREE KALLELI OORALI
	APPOOPPAN KAVU SAMRAKSHANA SAMITHI
Exhibit P2	TRUST DEED OF SREE KALLELI OORALI APPOOPPAN KAVU
Exhibit P3	NOTICE OF PATHAMUDAYA FESTIVAL AND ADITHYA WORSHIP 14.10.2012
Exhibit P4	NOTICE OF PATHAMUDAYA FESTIVAL AND ADITHYA WORSHIP 14.10.2013
Exhibit P5	NOTICE OF UTHRADA POOYAL AND OTHER OFFERRINGS
Exhibit P6	NOTICE OF PATHAMUDAYA FESTIVAL AND ADITHYA WORSHIP 14.10.2014
Exhibit P7	NOTICE OF PATHAMUDAYA FESTIVAL AND ADITHYA WORSHIP 14.10.2015
Exhibit P8	NOTICE OF PATHAMUDAYA FESTIVAL AND ADITHYA WORSHIP 14.10.2018
Exhibit P9	TRUE COPY OF NOTICES RELATING TO PUNYA DARSHANAM
Exhibit P10	NEWSPAPAER CUTTING IN CONNECTION WITH AMERICAN RESEARCH GROUP
Exhibit P11	WRITE UP ABOUT DEITY
Exhibit P12	COMPLAINT TO DSP PATHANAMTHITTA AGAINST THE CURRENT TRUSTEES DATED 17.09.2018
Exhibit P13	TRUE COPY OF THE RESIGNATION LETTER FROM THE TRUST BY THE MAIN POOJARI, OORALI DATED 21.02.2019
Exhibit P14	COPY OF WP (C) NO.5654/2022 DATED 17.02.2022
Exhibit P15	COPY OF COMPLAINT TO COMPLAINT TO THE
	SUB/CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KONNI SHO,

¶33

W.P.(C).36385/2022

¶34

¶35

PATHANAMTHITTA AGAINST THE CURRENT TRUSTEES DATED 06.04.2022

1. Aneesh Kumar v. Sree Kalleli Oorali Appooppankavu (Moolasthanam) Trust Represented by Managing Trustee C.v.Santha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

1. Aneesh Kumar v. Sree Kalleli Oorali Appooppankavu (Moolasthanam) Trust Represented by Managing Trustee C.v.Santha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jisha George, Vs the Federal Bank Ltd.

Rajeevan K Vs Registrar General, High Court of Kerala

Marysadan Edathala International Pvt. Ltd., Vs the Superintending Engineer, Public Works Department

T v Janardhanan Vs Assistant Executive Engineer

Shajeer Vs the State of Kerala

P.Hyder Ali Vs the Additional District Magistrate