Saleem M., v. State of Kerala
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court directed the 3rd respondent to consider the petitioner's application for renewal of a quarrying permit within ten days. The Court treated the petitioner's environmental clearance as valid until 4.4.2022, dismissing contentions that unrelated illegal quarrying proceedings impeded the renewal request.
What did the court decide?
Direction to the 3rd respondent to consider the petitioner's renewal application within ten days, treating the environmental clearance as valid until 4.4.2022.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN
FRIDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF MARCH 2022 / 4TH CHAITHRA, 1944 WP(C) NO.2893 OF 2022
PETITIONER :-
SALEEM M., AGED 62 YEARS S/O.LATE MYTHEEN KUNJU, SALEEM QUARRY, NEDUVATHOOR, SALIM MANZIL, NEDUVATHOOR, NEELESWARAM P.O., KOTTARAKKARA, KOLLAM.
BY ADV B.MOHAN LAL
RESPONDENTS :-
- 1 STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, INDUSTRIES DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM695 001.
- 2 THE DIRECTOR, MINING AND GEOLOGY, KESAVADASAPURAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM695 004.
- 3 THE DISTRICT GEOLOGIST, MINING AND GEOLOGY DEPARTMENT, ASRAMOM P.O., KOLLAM-691 002.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner's application for renewal of quarrying permit can be considered despite pending proceedings regarding illegal quarrying in a different property.
Whether the environmental clearance and order conditioning renewal on NGT orders have been set aside by a previous judgment.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Saleem M.
- respondent
State of Kerala
- respondent
The Director, Mining and Geology
- respondent
The District Geologist, Mining and Geology Department
- respondent
The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Kottarakkara
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court