Petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order of the Municipal Council. The matter was declared infructuous as it had become subservient to the high court judgment in WP(C) No. 15314 of 2009. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed as infructuous by this High Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN TUESDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF JULY 2022 / 14TH ASHADHA, 1944
WP(C) NO. 27976 OF 2013
PETITIONER:
VISALAKSHI W/O RAMACHANDRAN, 10/136, LANKESWARAM GRAMAM, CHITTUR, PALAKKAD BY ADVS. SRI.V.V.ASOKAN SRI.P.RAHUL
RESPONDENTS:
1 CHITTUR - THATTAMANGALAM MUNICIPALITY, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, CHITTUR, PALAKKAD - 678101 2 THE SECRETARY CHITTUR- THATTAMANGALAM MUNICIPALITY, CHITTUR, PALAKKAD - 678101 BY ADVS. SRI.V.N.HARIDAS SMT.KRIPA ELIZABETH MATHEWS SMT.C.B.SUMA DEVI SRI.V.M.SYAM KUMAR SRI.K.P.VIJAYAN
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05.07.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C) NO. 27976 OF 2013
2
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J.
-----------------------------W.P.(C).No. 27976 of 2013
---------------------------------------------Dated this the 05th day of July, 2022
JUDGMENT
When this writ petition came up for consideration,
the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner
submitted that the matter has become infructuous.
Therefore, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/-
DM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN JUDGE
Visalakshi W/O Ramachandran
Chittur- Thattamangalam Municipality
The Secretary Chittur- Thattamangalam Municipality
P.V.Kunhikrishnan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
