Allowed

Seema v. State of Kerala

Kerala HC1 Jul 2022WP(C)/8241/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This judgment disposed of four connected writ petitions challenging orders rejecting applications to correct land data bank. The court quashed the orders because the Local Level Monitoring Committee failed to consider the KSREC report and directed the Revenue Divisional Officer to remit the matter for fresh consideration.

What did the court decide?

The impugned orders by the Revenue Divisional Officer were quashed. The matter was remitted to the LLMC to consider the KSREC report and recommend to the Revenue Divisional Officer.

Seema Vs State of Kerala — RTI and Transparency | Kerala HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN

¶4

FRIDAY, THE 1^ST DAY OF JULY 2022 / 10TH ASHADHA, 1944

¶5

W.P(C) NO.8381 OF 2022

¶6

PETITIONERS:

¶7

VASU, AGED 81 YEARS, S/O. APPU, QUARTERS NO.46, AMRITHA VISWAVIDHYAPEEDAM, AMRITHA NAGAR, ETTIMADA, COIMBATORE, NOW RESIDING AT HOUSE NO.9/939, PAROPAADI, MARYKUNNU, KOZHIKODE-673 012.

¶8

BY ADV. UNNI. K.K. (EZHUMATTOOR)

¶9

RESPONDENTS:

¶10

1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, GOVT. SECRETARIATE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.

¶11

2 SUB COLLECTOR/REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICE, PALAKKADU-678 001.

¶12

3 LOCAL LEVEL MONITORING COMMITTEE, PUTHUSSERY GRAMAPANCHAYATH REPRESENTED BY ITS CONVENER, AGRICULTURAL OFFICER, KRISHI BHAVAN, PUDUSSERY, KANJIKODE P.O., PIN-678 621.

¶13

4 SECRETARY, PUTHUSSERY GRAMA PANCHAYATH, KANJIKODE P.O., PIN-678 621.

¶14

5 DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CIVIL STATION, KENATHUPARAMBU, KUNNATHURMEDU, PALAKKADU-678 001.

¶15

R4 SRI. BABU JOSEPH KURUVATHAZHA

¶16

R1-R3&R5 SMT. VIDYA KURIAKOSE, GOVERNMENT PLEADER

¶17

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01.07.2022, ALONG WITH W.P.(C)NOS.8241/2022, 8245/2022 AND CONNECTED CASES, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶18

-2-

¶19

W.P. (C) Nos.8241, 8245, 8265 & 8381 of 2022

¶20

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶21

PRESENT

¶22

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN

¶23

FRIDAY, THE 1^ST DAY OF JULY 2022 / 10TH ASHADHA, 1944 W.P.(C) NO.8241 OF 2022

¶24

PETITIONER:

¶25

SEEMA, AGED 41 YEARS, W/O. RITHOSH, CHOONDEKUZHIYIL HOUSE, PILASSSERY P.O., KUNNAMANGALAM, KOZHIKODE-673 571.

¶26

BY ADV. UNNI. K.K. (EZHUMATTOOR)

¶27

RESPONDENTS:

¶28

1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, GOVT. SECRETARIATE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.

¶29

2 SUB COLLECTOR/REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICE, PALAKKADU-678 001.

¶30

3 LOCAL LEVEL MONITORING COMMITTEE, PUTHUSSERY GRAMAPANCHAYATH REPRESENTED BY ITS CONVENER, AGRICULTURAL OFFICER, KRISHI BHAVAN, PUDUSSERY, KANJIKODE P.O., PIN-678 621.

¶31

4 DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CIVIL STATION, KENATHUPARAMBU, KUNNATHURMEDU, PALAKKADU-678 001.

¶32

R1-R4 SMT. VIDYA KURIAKOSE, GOVERNMENT PLEADER

¶33

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01.07.2022, ALONG WITH W.P.(C)NO.8381/2022 AND CONNECTED CASES, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶34

-3-

¶35

W.P. (C) Nos.8241, 8245, 8265 & 8381 of 2022

¶36

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT

¶37

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN

¶38

FRIDAY, THE 1^ST DAY OF JULY 2022 / 10TH ASHADHA, 1944 W.P.(C) NO.8245 OF 2022

¶39

PETITIONER:

¶40

CHANDRASEKHARAN NAIR B., AGED 48 YEARS, S/O. BALAKRISHNAN NAIR, PUSHPAMANGALAM HOUSE, CHEPPADU P.O., ALAPUZHA DISTRICT-690 507.

¶41

BY ADV. UNNI K.K. (EZHUMATTOOR)

¶42

RESPONDENTS:

¶43

1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, GOVT. SECRETARIATE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.

¶44

2 SUB COLLECTOR/REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICE, PALAKKADU-678 001.

¶45

3 LOCAL LEVEL MONITORING COMMITTEE, PUTHUSSERY GRAMAPANCHAYATH REPRESENTED BY ITS CONVENER,

¶46

AGRICULTURAL OFFICER, KRISHI BHAVAN, PUDUSSERY, KANJIKODE P.O.,PIN-678 621.

¶47

4 DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CIVIL STATION, KENATHUPARAMBU, KUNNATHURMEDU, PALAKKADU-678 001.

¶48

R1-R4 SMT. VIDYA KURIAKOSE, GOVERNMENT PLEADER

¶49

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01.07.2022, ALONG WITH W.P.(C) NO.8381/2022 AND CONNECTED CASES, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶50

-4-

¶51

W.P. (C) Nos.8241, 8245, 8265 & 8381 of 2022

¶52

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶53

PRESENT

¶54

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN FRIDAY, THE 1^ST DAY OF JULY 2022 / 10TH ASHADHA, 1944

¶55

W.P.(C) NO.8265 OF 2022

¶56

PETITIONER:

¶57

RAMESHKUMAR, AGED 56 YEARS, S/O. BALAKRISHNAN, CLEEM HOUSE, MARYKUNNU P.O., KOZHIKODE-673 012.

¶58

BY ADV. UNNI K.K. (EZHUMATTOOR)

¶59

RESPONDENTS:

¶60

1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, GOVT. SECRETARIATE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.

¶61

2 SUB COLLECTOR/REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICE, PALAKKADU-678 001.

¶62

3 LOCAL LEVEL MONITORING COMMITTEE, PUTHUSSERY GRAMAPANCHAYATH REPRESENTED BY ITS CONVENER, AGRICULTURAL OFFICER, KRISHI BHAVAN, PUDUSSERY, KANJIKODE P.O., PIN-678 621.

¶63

4 DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CIVIL STATION, KENATHUPARAMBU, KUNNATHURMEDU, PALAKKADU-678 001.

¶64

R1-R4 SMT. VIDYA KURIAKOSE, GOVERNMENT PLEADER

¶65

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01.07.2022, ALONG WITH W.P.(C) NO.8381/2022 AND CONNECTED CASES, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶66

-5-

¶67

W.P. (C) Nos.8241, 8245, 8265 & 8381 of 2022

¶68

P.V. KUNHIKRISHNAN, J.

¶69

W.P. (C) Nos.8241, 8245, 8265 & 8381 of 2022

¶70

Dated this the 1^st day of July, 2022

¶71

JUDGMENT

¶72

All these writ petitions are connected and therefore, I am disposing of these writ petitions by a common judgment.

¶73

The petitioner in W.P.(C) No.8381 of 2022 is the owner of 4.05 Ares (10 cents) of residential plot in Re-survey No.50/3 in Puthussery East Village in Palakkadu Taluk in Palakkadu District. The petitioner got the property from his son Syamlal as per the settlement deed No.5203/2015. Petitioner's son Syamlal purchased the property in the year 2011 vide Sale Deed No.2117/2011. According to the petitioner, the property is not a paddy land and the same was converted to coconut plantations even before the commencement of Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act, 2008. The son of the petitioner made an application for building permit and the 4^th respondent issued a building permit to construct a residential building. The Village Officer, Puthussery East on 07.05.2011 issued a possession

¶74

-6-

¶75

W.P. (C) Nos.8241, 8245, 8265 & 8381 of 2022

¶76

certificate to the son of the petitioner showing that the property is a residential plot. After construction of the house, the building was assessed for one time tax. After completion of residential building, the petitioner submitted a completion report and requested to number the building and to issue occupancy certificate. But the 4^th respondent has not numbered the building and directed to produce the order from the Revenue Divisional Officer to number the building. The property of the petitioner is included in the data bank was published in 2016 as paddy land in the name of the petitioner. The petitioner submitted an application in Form No.5 to the 2^nd respondent to correct the data bank and to remove the wrong entry. The application was forwarded to the 3^rd respondent and they obtained a report from the Kerala State Remote Sensing and Environment Centre (KSREC). But without considering the KSREC report, Local Level Monitoring Committee (LLMC) decided to keep the property as paddy land. Consequently, the Revenue Divisional Officer passed orders rejecting the application. Aggrieved by the same, this writ petition is filed. Similar is the situation in W.P.(C) Nos.8241 of 2022, 8245 of 2022 and 8265 of 2022. In all those cases, even

¶77

-7-

¶78

W.P. (C) Nos.8241, 8245, 8265 & 8381 of 2022

¶79

though there is report from the KSREC, the LLMC has not considered the same and consequently, the Revenue Divisional Officer rejected the application. Hence, all the writ petitions are filed. The properties in the other three writ petitions are adjacent properties.

¶80

Heard the counsel for the petitioners and the Government Pleader.

¶81

Admittedly, in these cases, there is a report from the KSREC. It is also an admitted fact that the LLMC has not considered the KSREC report before forwarding the matter to the Revenue Divisional Officer.

¶82

The Government Pleader after getting instruction from the Revenue Divisional Officer submitted that the LLMC has not considered KSREC report. If that is the case, the impugned orders passed by the Revenue Divisional Officer in these writ petitions can be set aside and the Revenue Divisional Officer can be directed to remit the matter to the LLMC and the LLMC can consider the KSREC report and thereafter, submit the recommendation to the Revenue Divisional Officer so that the Revenue Divisional Officer can pass consequential orders.

¶83

-8-

¶84

W.P. (C) Nos.8241, 8245, 8265 & 8381 of 2022

¶85

Therefore, these writ petitions are disposed of with the

¶86

following directions:-

¶87

i) The impugned orders passed by the Revenue Divisional Officer in these writ petitions are quashed. ii) The Revenue Divisional Officer in these writ petitions will remit the matter to the LLMC concerned and the LLMC, after considering the KSREC report, will recommend the matter to the Revenue Divisional Officer concerned.

¶88

iii) Based on the recommendation of the LLMC, the Revenue Divisional Officer will pass appropriate orders in accordance with law.

¶89

iv) The above exercise should be completed by the Revenue Divisional Officer and the LLMC as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

¶90

Sd/-

¶91

P.V. KUNHIKRISHNAN

bpr

-9-

W.P. (C) Nos.8241, 8245, 8265 & 8381 of 2022

¶96

APPENDIX OF W.P.(C) NO.8241/2022

¶97

PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS

¶98

EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE SETTLEMENT DEED NO.5200/2015. EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE DATA BANK ISSUED UNDER THE RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT. EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 14.3.2019. EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE REPORT DATED 3.11.2020 OF KSREC. EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 6.9.2021 OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P6 TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY VASU DATED 24.1.2022. EXHIBIT P7 TRUE COPY OF THE INFORMATION PROVIDED UNDER THE RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT. EXHIBIT P8 TRUE COPY OF THE PAGE NOS 15 TO 30 OF MINUTES OF LLMC DATED 19.10.2020. EXHIBIT P9 TRUE COPY OF THE PAGE NOS 131 TO 142 OF MINUTES OF LLMC DATED 2.3.2020.

¶99

-10-

¶100

W.P. (C) Nos.8241, 8245, 8265 & 8381 of 2022

¶101

APPENDIX OF W.P.(C) NO.8245/2022

¶102

PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS

¶103

EXHIBIT P1	TRUE COPY OF THE SETTLEMENT DEED NO.5202/2015.
EXHIBIT P2	TRUE COPY OF THE DATA BANK ISSUED UNDER THE RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT.
EXHIBIT P3	TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 6.2.2019.
EXHIBIT P4	TRUE COPY OF THE REPORT DATED 3.11.2020 OF KSREC.
EXHIBIT P5	TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 6.9.2021 OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P6	TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY VASU DATED 24.1.2022.
EXHIBIT P7	TRUE COPY OF THE INFROMATION PROVIDED UNDER THE RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT.
EXHIBIT P8	TRUE COPY OF THE PAGE NOS 15 TO 30 OF MINUTES OF LLMC DATED 19.10.2020.
EXHIBIT P9	TRUE COPY OF THE PAGE NOS 131 TO 142 OF MINUTES OF LLMC DATED 2.3.2020.

¶104

-11-

¶105

W.P. (C) Nos.8241, 8245, 8265 & 8381 of 2022

¶106

APPENDIX OF W.P.(C) NO.8265/2022

¶107

PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS

¶108

EXHIBIT P1	TRUE COPY OF THE SETTLEMENT DEED NO.5201/2015.
EXHIBIT P2	TRUE COPY OF THE DATA BANK ISSUED UNDER THE RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT.
EXHIBIT P3	TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 7.2.2019.
EXHIBIT P4	TRUE COPY OF THE REPORT DATED 13.10.2020 OF KSREC.
EXHIBIT P5	TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 15.01.2021 OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P6	TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY VASU DATED 24.1.2022.
EXHIBIT P7	TRUE COPY OF THE INFROMATION PROVIDED UNDER THE RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT.
EXHIBIT P8	TRUE COPY OF THE PAGE NOS 15 TO 30 OF MINUTES OF LLMC DATED 19.10.2020.
EXHIBIT P9	TRUE COPY OF THE PAGE NOS 131 TO 142 OF MINUTES OF LLMC DATED 2.3.2020.

¶109

-12-

¶110

W.P. (C) Nos.8241, 8245, 8265 & 8381 of 2022

¶111

APPENDIX OF W.P.(C) NO.8381/2022

¶112

PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS

¶113

EXHIBIT P1	TRUE COPY OF THE SETTLEMENT DEED NO.5203/2015.
EXHIBIT P2	TRUE COPY OF THE POSSESSION CERTIFICATE DATED 7.5.2011 ISSUED TO SYAMLAL.
EXHIBIT P3	TRUE COPY OF THE POSSESSION CERTIFICATE DATED 31.7.2010 ISSUED TO NAGARAJ.
EXHIBIT P4	TRUE COPY OF THE BUILDING PERMIT DATED 4.1.2014 ISSUED TO SYAMLAL.
EXHIBIT P5	TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 26.11.2018 ISSUED BY THE VILLAGE OFFICER.
EXHIBIT P6	TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT ON 9.8.2017.
EXHIBIT P7	TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 27.11.2018 ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P8	TRUE COPY OF THE CIRCULAR DATED 13.08.2018.
EXHIBIT P9	TRUE COPY OF THE DATA BANK ISSUED UNDER THE RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT.
EXHIBIT P10	TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 4.2.2019.
EXHIBIT P11	TRUE COPY OF THE REPORT DATED 13.10.2020 OF KSREC.
EXHIBIT P12	TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 15.1.2021.
EXHIBIT P13	TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 24.1.2022.

¶114

-13-

¶115

W.P. (C) Nos.8241, 8245, 8265 & 8381 of 2022

¶116

EXHIBIT P14 TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY PROVIDED UNDER THE RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT. EXHIBIT P15 TRUE COPY OF THE PAGE NOS 15 TO 30 OF MINUTES OF LLMC DATED 19.10.2020.

¶117

EXHIBIT P16 TRUE COPY OF THE PAGE NOS 131 TO 142 OF MINUTES OF LLMC DATED 2.3.2020.

Seema v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Seema v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Padmaja, Vs State of Kerala

Faisath Vs the State of Kerala

Secretary , Chenkal Grama Panchayat Vs Ombudsman for Local Self Government Institutions

Brd Motors Limited Vs Thrikkur Grama Panchayath

Dr.K.P.Ayyappan Vs Secretary to Government

Sudev Sathian Vs Corporation of Thrissur