Shahubanath v. Mr. Rethu T. Das
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous based on the submission by the petitioner's counsel.
What did the court decide?
The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN
TUESDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF JULY 2022 / 21ST ASHADHA, 1944
W.P.(C) NO.27487 OF 2013
PETITIONER:
SHAHUBANATH, W/O. SANTHOSH, RESIDING AT NOORUL EAMAN MANZIL, PERUMBAIKKAD.P.O., PERUMBAIKKADU VILLAGE, KOTTAYAM TALUK, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT FROM ANDOOKKALAYIL HOUSE, PERUMBAIKKADU VILLAGE, KOTTAYAM TALUK.
BY ADVS. SMT. SARITHA THOMAS SRI. SAJEEVAN KURUKKUTTIYULLATHIL
RESPONDENTS:
*** 1 MR. RETHU T. DAS, S/O. THULASIDAS, RESIDING AT VANDIPETTAYIL HOUSE, PERUMBAKKATTSSERY KARA, PERUMBAIKKAD.P.O., PERUMBAIKKAD VILLAGE, KOTTAYAM TALUK-686 016. * (DELETED FROM THE PARTY ARRAY AT THE RISK OF THE PETITIONER AS PER ORDER DATED 25.11.2013 IN I.A. NO.15584/2013)**
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Shahubanath
- respondent
Rethu T. Das
- respondent
Renjith T. Das
- respondent
The Kottayam Municipality
- respondent
Sub Inspector of Police, Gandhi Nagar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court