D.C Vincent v. the Balaramapuram Grama Panchayat
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner challenged compounding orders and license renewals/issuance by the Panchayat. Counsel argued the prayers were infructuous, leading the Court to close the writ petitions without adjudication.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN
TUESDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF JULY 2022 / 21ST ASHADHA, 1944
W.P.(C) NO.26726 OF 2013
PETITIONER:
D.C. VINCENT,
S/O.DEVADANAM, LIZY ENTERPRISES, BP 111/1389, SIVANCOIL ROAD, BALARAMAPURAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 501.
BY ADVS. SRI. PIRAPPANCODE V.S.SUDHIR
SRI. SHAJIN S.HAMEED
RESPONDENTS:
1 THE BALARAMAPURAM GRAMA PANCHAYAT REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, BALARAMAPURAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 501.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
D.C. Vincent
- petitioner
Lissy Enterprises
- respondent
The Balaramapuram Grama Panchayat
- respondent
The Secretary, Balaramapuram Grama Panchayat
- respondent
Sivan Kovil Road Residents Association
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court