Xxxxx v. District Magistrate
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition filed by petitioner apprehending that his grandchild is not being properly cared for by the 4th and 5th respondents. Court considered police report which concluded child was properly looked after and closed the petition.
What did the court decide?
Petitioner's apprehension found misplaced based on police report; writ petition closed.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.G.ARUN
MONDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2022 / 28TH BHADRA, 1944
WP(C) NO. 26308 OF 2022
PETITIONER/S:
xxx
BY ADV AYYAPPAN SANKAR
RESPONDENT/S:WP(C) NO. 26308 OF 2022
1 DISTRICT MAGISTRATE
CIVIL STATION, KUDAPPANAKUNNU, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM -695043.
2 CHILD WELFARE COMMITTEE (JUVENILE JUSTICE ACT), REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRPERSON, POOJAPPURA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695012.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the apprehension that the petitioner's grand child is not being properly taken care of is misplaced.
Whether a writ petition should be allowed on basis of police report regarding child care.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
xxx
- respondent
1st Respondent
- respondent
2nd Respondent
- respondent
3rd Respondent
- respondent
4th Respondent
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court