Disposed

Rajesh Kumar P.S v. the Tahsildar

Kerala HC19 Jul 2022WP(C)/17918/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Five Writ Petitions (C) comprising Nos. 12713, 15273, 17648, 17911, and 17918 of 2013, involving multiple petitioners against Kerala administrative officers and the Public Service Commission, were listed together. No substantive arguments or facts were recorded in the text provided beyond the heading.

What did the court decide?

Proceedings closed as infructuous. No specific relief or substantive direction recorded.

Rajesh Kumar P.S Vs the Tahsildar — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Kerala HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C. JAYACHANDRAN

¶4

TUESDAY, THE 19^TH DAY OF JULY 2022 / 28TH ASHADHA, 1944 WP(C) NO. 12713 OF 2013

¶5

PETITIONER:

¶6

SANTHOSH P.G., AGED 36 YEARS S/O K.GOPALAN, PLAMOOTTIL HOUSE, LAHA P.O., PERUNAD, RANNI TALUK, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT. BY ADVS. SRI.K.SHAJ SRI.RENJIT GEORGE SRI.SAJJU.S

¶7

RESPONDENTS:

¶8

1 THE TAHSILDAR, RANNI TALUK, RANNI-689 661.

¶9

2 VILLAGE OFFICER PERUNAD-689 662.

¶10

3 THE KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION PATTOM PALACE P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY-695 012.

¶11

BY ADV SRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN, SC, KPSC

¶12

OTHER PRESENT:

¶13

SMT.LATHA.T.THANKAPPAN -SPL.G.P(SC/ST)

¶14

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 19.07.2022, ALONG WITH WP(C).NO.15273/201 AND CONNECTED CASES, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶15

WP(C) NOS.12713 OF 2013 & CONNT. CASES

¶16

-: 2 :-

¶17

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶18

PRESENT

¶19

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C. JAYACHANDRAN TUESDAY, THE 19^TH DAY OF JULY 2022 / 28TH ASHADHA, 1944 WP(C) NO. 15273 OF 2013

¶20

PETITIONER:

¶21

SURESH.K.M., AGED 35 YEARS S/O.KUNJUKUNJU, PARAVILA PUTHEN VEEDU, NELLIPPALLY P O, KALLAR, PUNALUR, VALACODE VILLAGE, EDAMON, SHALIACARRY ESTATE, KOLLAM DIST, ORIGINALLY OF MARUTHIMOOTTIL , LAHA P.O., PATHANAMTHITTA DIST. BY ADVS. SRI.K.SHAJ SRI.SAJJU.S

¶22

RESPONDENTS:

¶23

1 THE TAHSILDAR, RANNI TALUK,

¶24

RANNI, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT-689 623.

¶25

2 THE TAHSILDAR, PUNALUR TALUK, PUNALUR, KOLLAM DISTRICT-691 006.

¶26

3 THE VILLAGE OFFICER PUNALUR, KOLLAM DISTRICT-691 006.

¶27

4 THE KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, PATTOM PALACE P O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 009, REP BY ITS SECRETARY BY ADV SRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN, SC, KPSC SMT.LATHA.T.THANKAPPAN -SPL.G.P(SC/ST)

¶28

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 19.07.2022, ALONG WITH WP(C).NO.12713/2013 AND CONNECTED CASES, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶29

WP(C) NOS.12713 OF 2013 & CONNT. CASES

¶30

-: 3 :-

¶31

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶32

PRESENT

¶33

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C. JAYACHANDRAN TUESDAY, THE 19^TH DAY OF JULY 2022 / 28TH ASHADHA, 1944 WP(C) NO. 17648 OF 2013

¶34

PETITIONERS:

¶35

1 CHANDANA.S, AGED 17 YEARS D/O. SUDHAKARAN M.K., MARUTHIMOOTIL, LAHA P.O., PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT (MINOR, REPRESENTED BY HER LEGAL GUARDIAN, THE SECOND PETITIONER HEREIN).

¶36

2 SUDHAKARAN M.K., AGED 50 YEARS S/O. KUNJUKUNJU, MARUTHIMOOTIL, LAHA P.O., PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT.

¶37

BY ADV SRI.K.SHAJ

¶38

RESPONDENTS:

¶39

1 THE TAHSILDAR, RANNI TALUK, RANNI, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT-689 645.

¶40

2 THE VILLAGE OFFICER

¶41

PERUNAD, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT-689 639.

¶42

BY SMT.LATHA.T.THANKAPPAN -SPL.G.P(SC/ST)

¶43

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 19.07.2022, ALONG WITH WP(C).NO.12713/2013 AND CONNECTED CASES, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶44

WP(C) NOS.12713 OF 2013 & CONNT. CASES

¶45

-: 4 :-

¶46

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶47

PRESENT

¶48

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C. JAYACHANDRAN

¶49

TUESDAY, THE 19^TH DAY OF JULY 2022 / 28TH ASHADHA, 1944 WP(C) NO. 17911 OF 2013

¶50

PETITIONER:

¶51

RENSU.A.S., AGED 21 YEARS, S/O. SUDHAKARAN M.K, MARUTHIMOOTIL, LAHA P.O., PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT.

¶52

BY ADVS. SRI.K.SHAJ SRI.SAJJU.S

¶53

RESPONDENTS:

¶54

1 THE TAHSILDAR RANNI TALUK, RANNI, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT-689 645

¶55

2 THE VILLAGE OFFICER PERUNAD, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT-689 621

¶56

BY SMT.LATHA.T.THANKAPPAN -SPL.G.P(SC/ST)

¶57

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 19.07.2022, ALONG WITH WP(C).NO.12713/2013 AND CONNECTED CASES, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶58

WP(C) NOS.12713 OF 2013 & CONNT. CASES

¶59

-: 5 :-

¶60

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶61

PRESENT

¶62

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C. JAYACHANDRAN

¶63

TUESDAY, THE 19^TH DAY OF JULY 2022 / 28TH ASHADHA, 1944 WP(C) NO. 17918 OF 2013

¶64

PETITIONERS:

¶65

1 RAJESH KUMAR P.S AGED 17 YEARS, S/O. SADASIVAN, P.V. PLAMOOTIL, LAHA P.O., PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT (MINOR, REPRESENTED BY HIS LEGAL GUARDIAN, THE SECOND PETITIONER HEREIN)

¶66

2 SADASIVAN P.V AGED 45 YEARS, S/O. JANAKI VELAYUDHAN, PLAMOOTIL, LAHA P.O., PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT. BY ADV SRI.K.SHAJ

¶67

RESPONDENTS:

¶68

1 THE TAHSILDAR

¶69

RANNI TALUK, RANNI, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT-689 645.

¶70

2 THE VILLAGE OFFICER PERUNAD, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT-689 612.

¶71

BY SMT.LATHA.T.THANKAPPAN -SPL.G.P(SC/ST)

¶72

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD

¶73

ON 19.07.2022, ALONG WITH WP(C).NO.12713/2013 AND CONNECTED CASES, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶74

WP(C) NOS.12713 OF 2013 & CONNT. CASES

¶75

-: 6 :-

¶76

C. JAYACHANDRAN J.

¶77

--------------------------------------------- W.P.(C).Nos.12713, 15273, 17648, 17911 & 17918 of 2013

¶78

Dated this the 19 th day of July, 2022

¶79

J U D G M E N T

¶80

Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted

¶81

that the subject matter in the above writ petitions

¶82

have become infructuous and therefore not pressed. The

¶83

submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is recorded. Accordingly, these writ petitions are

¶84

closed as infructuous.

¶85

Sd/-

¶86

C. JAYACHANDRAN , JUDGE

¶87

Rajesh Kumar P.S v. the Tahsildar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajesh Kumar P.S v. the Tahsildar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Fathima Vs Nazar

Jinesh.M.R Vs Mohammed Rasad

Shailaja Vs Aaron

S.Prabhakaran Vs the Indian Oil Corporation Ltd.

Jaleel Hussain Vs Kottayam Muncipality

Satheesh Kumar S. Vs the Indian Oil Corporation Ltd.