Manoj. M v. the Manager, Hdb Financial Services .
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought closure of writ petition disputing an amount due to the respondent bank. The court noted the amount was remitted but preserved the respondent's right to recover the vehicle for future defaults.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition closed as the disputed amount has been remitted, without prejudice to respondent's rights.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.G.ARUN
MONDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF JUNE 2022 / 16TH JYAISHTA, 1944 WP(C) NO. 14929 OF 2022
PETITIONER/S:
MANOJ. M AGED 32 YEARS S/O.MURUKARAJ. MANOJ BHAVAN, EDAPALAYAM P.O,ARYANKAVU, ARIENKAVU KALTHURTHY, KOLLAM , PIN - 691309 BY ADVS. A.CHANDRA BABU V.RAJEEV KUMAR
RESPONDENT/S:
THE MANAGER, HDB FINANCIAL SERVICES . THE MANAGER, HDB FINANCIAL SERVICES SPRINGS, 1ST FLOOR, NEAR RELIANCE FRESH EDAPPAZHNJI, THYCAUD P.O, TRIVANDRUM-695014 , PIN - 695014 BY ADV B.S.SURESH KUMAR
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06.06.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
W.P.(C) No.14929 of 2022
-2-
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Manoj. M Aged 32 Years
- respondent
The Manager, HDB Financial Services
Coram
V.G. Arun
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court