examination. The same view was reiterated by the Apex Court in Madan Lal v. State of J & K [(1997) 7 SCC 677], wherein, the Apex Court in paragraph 9 held that, the petitioners who have participated in the written test and oral interview on the basis of the notification issued after the selection procedure is over, is not entitled to attack the constitution of the selection committee. In Manish Kumar Shahi v. State of Bihar [(2010) 12 SCC 576], the aforesaid principle was reiterated and held that the petitioner who has approached the writ Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, after finding that his name does not figure in the merit list prepared by the commission, is not entitled to get any relief. In Pradeep Kumar Rai and Others v. Dinesh Kumar Pandy and Others [2015 11 SCC 493], the question considered was in respect of a promotion to a post and the selection process thereto, wherein the Apex Court held that the challenge to selection process after participating in the interview and declaration of adverse result, is not maintainable, since the participation in the selection process was without raising any objections.
