Leena.P.K v. Aneesh.C.I
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Kerala, on the application of counsel appearing for petitioners, dismissed Transfer Petition No.86 of 2020 as not pressed.
What did the court decide?
Transfer Petition dismissed as not pressed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BASANT BALAJI
MONDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF MAY 2022 / 9TH JYAISHTA, 1944
TR.P.(C) NO.86 OF 2020
(AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OP 1066/2018 OF FAMILY
COURT, ERNAKULAM)
PETITIONER/RESPONDENTS 1&3:
1 LEENA.P.K, AGED 42 YEARS, D/O.LATE KURIYAKOSE, PANACHIKKAL HOUSE, THONOOR KARA, ROYAL PALACE ROAD, OPPOSITE CHELAKKARA PANCHAYAT OFFICE, CHELAKKARA, CHELAKKARA P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN-680 586.
2 AITTA, AGED 20 YEARS, D/O.LEENA, PANACHIKKAL HOUSE, OPPOSITE CHELAKKARA PANCHAYAT, CHELAKKARA P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN-680 586.
BY ADVS. C.A.CHACKO SMT.C.M.CHARISMA
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Leena.P.K
- petitioner
Aitta
- respondent
Aneaesh.C.I
- respondent
Dominic Ambrose @ Tomy
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court