Saudha C.A. v. Jayasree J.
Case brief
What is this about?
Transfer Petition filed to move a partition suit from Thiruvananthapuram Family Court to Ernakulam Family Court was dismissed because remaining respondents did not support the transfer and the Thiruvananthapuram court retained jurisdiction over the property.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MARY JOSEPH
MONDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2022 / 14TH AGRAHAYANA, 1944
TR.P(C) NO. 652 OF 2018
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OP.NO.1780/2018 OF FAMILY COURT,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
PETITIONER :-
SAUDHA C.A.
AGED 44 YEARS
W/O.FAIZAL K.H., SAFATH MANZIL,
NANDIKULANGARA, MANNAM P.O., NORTH PARAVUR, ERNAKULAM
DISTRICT, PIN – 683520.
BY ADV P.M.BENZIR
RESPONDENTS :-
1JAYASREE J.
AGED 46 YEARS
W/O.SURESHBABU, KARTHIKA, ILLATHUPARAMBU, THEKKUMPURAM,
CHENDAMANGALAM, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN 683512.
2T. SARASWATHY AMMA,
AGED 62 YEARS,
W/O. (LATE) JAYACHANDRA RAVU,
NO.19, EIGHTEENTH STREET,
AMBAL NAGAR,
KEELKATTALAI, CHENNAI,
TAMIL NADU, PIN-600117.
3J.S. MALINI,
AGED 41 YEARS, W/O. VINOD,
NO.19, EIGHTEENTH STREET, AMBAL NAGAR,
KILKATTALI, CHENNAI,
TAMIL NADU,
PIN - 600117.
BY ADVS.
SRI.G.P.SHINOD
SRI.RAM MOHAN.G.
SRI.GOVIND PADMANAABHAN
SHRI.AJIT G ANJARLEKAR
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Original Petition should be transferred from Family Court, Thiruvananthapuram to Family Court, Ernakulam.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
SAUDHA C.A.
- respondent
JAYASREE J.
- respondent
T. SARASWATHY AMMA
- respondent
J.S. MALINI
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court