Dismissed
Shajumon v. Albert
Kerala HCOP(C)/4362/2013
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The Kerala High Court, in an original civil petition, held that the subject matter of the Original Petition had become infructuous and dismissed the petition accordingly.
What did the court decide?
The Original petition was dismissed as infructuous.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
¶2
PRESENT
¶3
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MARY JOSEPH
¶4
WEDNESDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2022 / 9TH AGRAHAYANA, 1944
¶5
OP(C) NO. 4362 OF 2013
¶6
IN O.S.NO.710/2008 OF I ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF COURT, NEYYATTINKARA
¶7
PETITIONER/3RD DEFENDANT:
¶8
SHAJUMON
S/O.CHELLAN, ELIZA COTTAGE, PUTHEN VILA,
ARAYOOR DESOM, CHENKAL VILLAGE,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT.
¶9
BY ADVS.SRI.G.S.REGHUNATH
SRI.K.RAJESH KANNAN
SRI.A.S.SHAMMY RAJ
SRI.P.SHANES
¶10
RESPONDENTS/PLAINTIFFS:
¶11
1ALBERT, S/O.YOVAN NADAR,
A.B.NIVAS PUTHEN VILA, AYIRA.P.O., ARAYOOR DESOM,
CHENKAL VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 126.
2BABY MABEL, W/O.ALBERT,
A.B.NIVAS PUTHEN VILA, AYIRA.P.O., ARAYOOR DESOM,
CHENKAL VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 126.
BY ADVS.SRI.GOVIND PADMANAABHAN
SRI.MANU V.
SRI.RAM MOHAN.G.
SRI.G.P.SHINOD
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
AI extract
Whether the Original Petition should be dismissed as the subject matter has become infructuous.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Shajumon
- respondent
Albert
- respondent
Baby Mabel
Coram
AI extract
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court