Raziya v. Shamnad
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Kerala dismissed Transfer Petition (Civil) No. 199 of 2020 as a default order because the petitioner failed to issue notice to the respondent despite a prior mandate dated 17.06.2022, and the court assumed she was no longer desirous of prosecuting the petition.
What did the court decide?
The transfer petition is dismissed for default.
What the court decided
1
TR.P(C) NO. 199 OF 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS
FRIDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF JUNE 2022 / 3RD ASHADHA, 1944 TR.P(C) NO. 199 OF 2020
OP 1/2020 OF FAMILY COURT, CHAVARA
PETITIONER/S:
RAZIYA AGED 29 YEARS D/O. ABDUL RAHIM, RESIDING AT RAZIYA MANZIL, KOTTAMKARA VILLAGE, CHANDANATHOPPU P.O., KOLLAM691 014
BY ADVS. SAIJU S. SHRI.PRAMOD T.M.
RESPONDENT/S:
SHAMNAD S/O. ASHRAF,AGED 35 YEARS, SHARFI VILLA, PADANAYARKULANGRA SOUTH, KARUNAGAPPALLY, KOLLAM TALUK, KOLLAM,PIN-680 518
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Raziya
- respondent
Shamnad
Coram
C.S. Dias
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court