Allowed
Shani Francis v. Biju Mathew
Kerala HCTr.P(C)/30/2022
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Civil court allowed a transfer petition seeking to move divorce proceedings from Muvattupuzha to Palakkad Family Court considering the petitioner's residence and convenience for defence.
What did the court decide?
Original Petition No. 963/2021 transferred from Family Court, Muvattupuzha to Family Court, Palakkad; records to be transmitted.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
1
¶2
Tr.P (C) No.30 of 2022
¶3
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
¶4
PRESENT
¶5
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS
¶6
THURSDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF JUNE 2022 / 2ND ASHADHA, 1944
TR.P(C) NO. 30 OF 2022
¶7
TO TRANSFER OP 963/2021 OF FAMILY COURT, MUVATTUPUZHA
¶8
PETITIONER/S:
¶9
SHANI FRANCIS
¶10
AGED 44 YEARS
¶11
D/O.FRANCIS, MULLAKKARA (H), KONGAD, MANIKKASSERI
P.O., PALAKKAD - 678 631.
BY ADV L.RAJESH NARAYAN
¶12
RESPONDENT/S:
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
AI extract
Whether the transfer petition seeking to transfer the divorce proceedings from Muvattupuzha to Palakkad due to the petitioner's residence and convenience should be allowed.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Shani Francis
- respondent
Biju Mathew
- respondent
Shiju Thomas
Coram
AI extract
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court