Gopinathan M.K. v. Valsala K.M
Case brief
What is this about?
A transfer petition under Section 127 Cr.P.C. was dismissed because the petitioner informed the court that the dispute had been settled and the petition was not pressed.
What the court decided
TR.P(C) NO. 126 OF 2021
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS
MONDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF JUNE 2022 / 23RD JYAISHTA, 1944
TR.P(C) NO. 126 OF 2021
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OP 929/2020 OF FAMILY COURT,
KOTTAYAM
PETITIONER/RESPONDENT:
GOPINATHAN M.K. AGED 71 YEARS S/O. KUNJUPANICKAR, CHAITHANYA PUTHENCRUZ P.O. PUTHENCRUZ VILLAGE, VELOORKARA, KUNNATHUNADU TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT 682 308.
BY ADVS. N.ASHOK KUMAR MARIAMMA GEORGE MARANGOLY
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Gopinathan M.K.
- respondent
Valsala K.M.
Coram
C.S. Dias
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court