Soumya.I.v v. N.Sreekumar
Case brief
What is this about?
The court disposed of a petition to set aside a common order dismissings. While no petition. The court ordered the court to deal with the matter itself, disposing within a timeline.
What did the court decide?
Directed the Court of the Additional Munsiff-II, Thiruvananthapuram to consider and dispose of O.S.No.1835/2016 as expeditiously as possible by giving due priority.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS
MONDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF JUNE 2022 / 23RD JYAISHTA, 1944
OP(C) NO. 251 OF 2019
AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 29.11.2018 IN CMA 50/2017 OF
I ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT, TRIVANDRUM
OS 1835/2016 OF III ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF COURT ,TRIVANDRUM
PETITIONER:
SOUMYA.I.V,
AGED 36 YEARS,
W/O.SURESH, SERA 65, PADMAVILASAM BUNGLOW,
VANROSS JUNCTION, GOP, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM,
NOW RESIDING AT THIRUVONAM, KONCHIRA P.O.,
VEMBAYAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
BY ADV J.JAYAKUMAR
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the Original Petition under Order XXXIX Rule 1 is maintainable given the suit is unduly delayed.
Whether it is necessary to direct the trial court to dismiss the petition or expedite disposal of the underlying suit before 2016.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Soumya.I.V
- respondent
N.Sreekumar
Coram
C.S. Dias
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court