The High Court of Kerala disposed of Review Petition No. 933 of 2022, filed by respondents 2 and 3 in an earlier original petition, seeking a review of a judgment directing the Family Court to consider a specific application. The Court dismissed the petition.
The Review Petition is dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN
&
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.G. AJITHKUMAR
TUESDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2022 / 26TH ASWINA, 1944 REVIEW PETITION NO. 933 OF 2022
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 16.09.2022 IN O.P.(FC) NO.537 OF 2022 OF THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA
REVIEW PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS 2 &3 :
1 JOHN CHERIAN AGED 76 YEARS, S/O. EZHUTHUPURAKKAL DAVID, EZHUTHUPURAKKAL HOUSE, UMA NAGAR, FIRST STREET,KOLAZHI (P.O), TRISSUR DISTRICT-680010.
2 LILLY JOHN CHERIAN, AGED 68 YEARS, W/O. JOHN CHERIAN, EZHUTHUPURAKKAL HOUSE, UMA NAGAR, FIRST STREET, KOLAZHI (P.O), THRISSUR DISTRICT-680010.
BY ADVS. JOBY JACOB PULICKEKUDY ANIL GEORGE
RESPONDENTS/PETITIONER & RESPONDENTS 1, 4 & 5:
1 A. SURESH KUMAR @ SURESHKUMAR, S/O. ARUMUGHAM, NO.44, VELLALAR STREET, MIN NAGAR, KANCHEEPURAM, TAMILNADU STATE-631501.
2
Review Petition No.933 of 2022
2 SIMI, WORKING AS ASSISTANT MANAGER, W/O. A. SURESH KUMAR AND D/O JOHN CHERIYAN, EZHUTHUPURAKKAL DAVID, EZHUTHUPURAKKAL HOUSE, UMA NAGAR, FIRST STREET, KOLAZHI (P.O), TRISSUR DISTRICT-680010.
THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18.10.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
3
Review Petition No.933 of 2022
O R D E R
Anil K. Narendran, J.
The petitioners, who are respondents 2 and 3 in O.P. (FC) No.537 of 2022, have filed this Review Petition invoking the provisions under Order XLVII, Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking an order to review the judgment of this Court dated 16.09.2022, whereby that Original Petition was disposed of by directing the Family Court, Thrissur, to consider Ext.P5 interlocutory application, i.e., I.A.No.11 of 2022 in O.P.No.347 of 2022, before proceeding with the trial of O.P.No.99 of 2008, O.P.(G&W) No.100 of 2018 and M.C.No.24 of 2018.
4
Review Petition No.933 of 2022
In such circumstances, we find no reason to entertain this Review Petition. The Review Petition is accordingly
dismissed.
Sd/ANIL K. NARENDRAN, JUDGE
Sd/P.G. AJITHKUMAR, JUDGE
dkr
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Review Petition should be entertained despite the prior dismissal of the interlocutory application by the Family Court.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
John Cherian
Lilly John Cherian
A. Suresh Kumar @ Sureshkumar
Simi
The Secretary, Kolazhi Service Cooperative Bank Ltd
The Manager, Federal Bank Ltd
Anil K. Narendran
P.G. Ajithkumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
