Partly allowed
Rukmani v. Rajamma
Kerala HCRP/76/2022
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Court disposed of a review petition, leaving a disputed question regarding the relationship between the parties open for adjudication by the trial court and extending the time limit for three months.
What did the court decide?
Time limit extended for three months; disputed relationship question left open for trial court.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
¶2
PRESENT
¶3
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN
¶4
TUESDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF FEBRUARY 2022 / 12TH MAGHA, 1943
¶5
RP NO. 76 OF 2022
¶6
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN RFA 238/2015 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM
¶7
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 31/10/2014 IN O.S.NO.376/2013
OF III ADDITIONAL SUB COURT, ERNAKULAM
¶8
REVIEW PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS:
¶9
1 RUKMANI, AGED 80 YEARS, W/O LATE SIVANANDI, VADAKKEMANGALATH HOUSE, MONASTREE LANE, KARIKKAMURI, ERNAKULAM VILLAGE, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI-682 011.
¶10
2 JAYAN V.S, AGED 56 YEARS, S/O LATE SIVANANDI, VADAKKEMANGALATH HOUSE, MONASTREE LANE, KARIKKAMURI, ERNAKULAM VILLAGE, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI-682 011.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Rukmani
- petitioner
Jayan V.S
- petitioner
Geetha V.S
- petitioner
Radakrishnan V.S
- respondent
Rajamma V.K.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court