The High Court at Ernakulam dismissed an arbitration appeal dated 01.02.2022 as barred by limitation, observing that the appeal was not filed within the prescribed period from the impugned order of 2015.
The appeal is dismissed as barred by limitation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN
TUESDAY, THE 1st DAY OF FEBRUARY 2022 / 12TH MAGHA, 1943
ARB.A NO. 29 OF 2021 (C)
AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 28.09.2015 IN OPARB 59/2011 OF DISTRICT
COURT, PALAKKAD
APPELLANTS/PETITIONERS:
BY ADV S.SUJIN
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS:
BY ADV MATHEWS K.PHILIP
THIS ARBITRATION APPEALS HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01.02.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Arb.Appeal No.29 of 2021
2
JUDGMENT
The appeal stood barred by limitation. Hence, the appeal is dismissed as barred by limitation.
Sd/-
P.SOMARAJAN
JUDGE
DMR/-
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the arbitration appeal is maintainable having been filed beyond the limitation period.
Whether to dismiss the appeal on the ground of bars by limitation.
V.S.VIJAYARAGHAVAN
V V SYAM
THE NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA
THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR AND SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR
P.SOMARAJAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
