Revision petition dismissed as infructuous after revision petitioners surrendered vacant possession of the tenanted premises.
Revision petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
&
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SHOBA ANNAMMA EAPEN
TUESDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2022 / 17TH KARTHIKA, 1944
RCREV. NO. 159 OF 2020
RCA NO.123 OF 2018 OF RENT CONTROL APPELLATE AUTHORITY,
KOZHIKODE
RCP NO.112 OF 2016 OF RENT CONTROL COURT, KOZHIKODE
REVISION PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS:
BY ADVS. V.SREENATH SRI.P.K.SAJEEV
RESPONDENT/S:
..2..
RCREV. NO. 159 OF 2020
BY ADVS. SRI.K.M.FIROZ SMT.M.SHAJNA
THIS RENT CONTROL REVISION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08.11.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
..3..
RCREV. NO. 159 OF 2020
JUDGMENT
A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.
The learned counsel for the revision
petitioners submits that the matter has become infructuous as the revision petitioners have surrendered vacant possession of the tenanted premises.
Recording the above submission, this revision
petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/-
A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
JUDGE
Sd/-
SHOBA ANNAMMA EAPEN
JUDGE
bka/-
Thottathil Muhammad Ali
Kottithara Valiyakath Abdul Azeez
Punnasserry Hyderali
A.Muhamd Mustaque
Shoba Annamma Eapen
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
