Dismissed

Vincy Sebastian v. Praveen Mathew

Kerala HC7 Nov 2022CO/78/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Kerala dismissed Matrimonial Appeal No. 1173/2018 and Matrimonial Appeal No. 1174/2018, along with Cross-Objection No. 78/2021. The appeals were ultimately dismissed after being withdrawn by the appellants and the cross-objection was dismissed as not pressed.

What did the court decide?

Permission granted to withdraw appeals; appeals dismissed as withdrawn; cross-objection dismissed; records returned to Family Court, Palakkad.

Vincy Sebastian Vs Praveen Mathew — Matrimonial and Divorce | Kerala HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE &

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SHOBA ANNAMMA EAPEN MONDAY, THE 7^TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2022 / 16TH KARTHIKA, 1944 MAT.APPEAL NO. 1173 OF 2018

¶5

AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN O.P.NO.328/2011 OF FAMILY COURT, PALAKKAD

¶6

APPELLANT/PETITIONER:

¶7

PRAVEEN MATHEW, AGED 37 YEARS, S/O.JOSEPH MATHEW, CHELLAMKOTT HOUSE, VADAKKANCHERRY, PALAKKAD.

¶8

BY ADVS. JACOB SEBASTIAN K.V.WINSTON ANU JACOB

¶9

RESPONDENT/S:

¶10

VINCY SEBASTIAN, AGED 35 YEARS, D/O.SEBASTIAN, VATTAKLIL HOUSE, KONNACHAL (P.O), KAPPALA, ERUMADU, NILGIRI, TAMIL NADU 643 101.

¶11

BY ADVS. SRI.T.V.GEORGE (CAVEATOR) SRI.T.V.GEORGE SRI.JIMMY GEORGE (THADATHIL)

¶12

THIS MATRIMONIAL APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 07.11.2022, ALONG WITH CO.78/2021 AND MAT.APPEAL NO.1174/2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶13

Mat.Appeal No.1174/2018 2

¶14

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶15

PRESENT

¶16

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE

¶17

¶18

THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SHOBA ANNAMMA EAPEN

¶19

MONDAY, THE 7^TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2022 / 16TH KARTHIKA, 1944

¶20

CO NO. 78 OF 2021

¶21

AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN O.P.NO.744/2012 OF FAMILY COURT,

¶22

PALAKKAD

¶23

CROSS OBJECTOR/RESPONDENT:

¶24

VINCY SEBASTIAN, AGED 38 YEARS, D/O.SEBASTIAN, VATTAKLIL HOUSE, KONNACHAL (P.O.), KAPPALA, ERUMADU, NILGIRI, TAMIL NADU - 643 101.

¶25

BY ADVS.

¶26

T.V.GEORGE JIMMY GEORGE (THADATHIL)

¶27

RESPONDENTS/APPELLANTS:

¶28

1 PRAVEEN MATHEW, S/O.JOSEPH MATHEW, CHELLAMKOTT HOUSE, VADAKKANCHERRY, PALAKKAD-678683.

¶29

2 JOSEPH MATHEW, AGED 67 YEARS, S/O.JOSEPH, CHELLAMKOTT HOUSE, VADAKKANCHERRY, PALAKKAD-678683.

¶30

3 THRESSIAMMA, AGED 61 YEARS, W/O.JOSEPH MATHEW, CHELLAMKOTT HOUSE, VADAKKANCHERRY, PALAKKAD-678683.

¶31

BY ADV C.AJITH KUMAR

¶32

THIS CROSS OBJECTION/CROSS APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 07.11.2022, ALONG WITH Mat.Appeal.1173/2018 AND CONNECTED CASE, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶33

Mat.Appeal No.1174/2018 3

¶34

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶35

PRESENT

¶36

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE

¶37

¶38

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE SHOBA ANNAMMA EAPEN

¶39

MONDAY, THE 7^TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2022 / 16TH KARTHIKA, 1944

¶40

MAT.APPEAL NO. 1174 OF 2018

¶41

AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN O.P.NO.744/2012 OF FAMILY COURT,

¶42

PALAKKAD

¶43

APPELLANTS/RESPONDENTS:

¶44

1 PRAVEEN MATHEW, AGED 37 YEARS, S/O.JOSEPH MATHEW, CHELLAMKOTT HOUSE, VADAKKANCHERRY, PALAKKAD.

¶45

2 JOSEPH MATHEW, AGED 64 YEARS, S/O.JOSEPH, CHELLAMKOTT HOUSE, VADAKKANCHERRY, PALAKKAD.

¶46

3 THRESSIAMMA, AGED 58 YEARS, W/O.JOSEPH MATHEW, CHELLAMKOTT HOUSE, VADAKKANCHERRY, PALAKKAD.

¶47

BY ADVS. Jacob Sebastian C.AJITH KUMAR SMT.P.PREETHA SHRI.RAJEEVU L.G. K.V.WINSTON(K/147/2010) ANU JACOB(K/1072/2013)

¶48

RESPONDENT/PETITIONER:

¶49

VINCY SEBASTIAN, D/O.SEBASTIAN, AGED 35 YEARS, VATTAKLIL HOUSE, KONNACHAL (P.O.), KAPPALA, ERUMADU, NILGIRI, TAMIL NADU - 643 101.

¶50

BY ADVS. SRI.T.V.GEORGE (CAVEATOR) SRI.T.V.GEORGE SRI.JIMMY GEORGE (THADATHIL)

¶51

THIS MATRIMONIAL APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 07.11.2022, ALONG WITH MAT.APPEAL.NO.1173/2018 AND C.O. NO.78 OF 2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶52

Mat.Appeal No.1174/2018 4

¶53

JUDGMENT

¶54

[Mat.Appeal No.1173/2018, C.O.No.78/2021 and Mat.Appeal No.1174/2018]

¶55

A.Muhamed Mustaque, J .

¶56

The learned counsel for the appellants seeks

¶57

permission to withdraw these appeals. Permission is granted. Accordingly, these appeals are dismissed as withdrawn.

¶58

It is submitted that the Cross-objection

¶59

is not pressed. Accordingly, the Cross-objection is dismissed as not pressed.

¶60

We direct the registry to send back the

¶61

records to the Family Court, Palakkad.

¶62

Sd/-

¶63

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE

¶64

JUDGE

¶65

Sd/-

¶66

SHOBA ANNAMMA EAPEN

¶67

JUDGE

¶68

Vincy Sebastian v. Praveen Mathew

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vincy Sebastian v. Praveen Mathew

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mariamma Samuel Vs Mariyamma Joy John

Suresh Vs Mariamma Joy John

K.T.Thomas Vs Mariamma Joy John

Ali Vs Muhammed Ali

P.v.Raveendran Vs C.v.Ushakumari

Thalakkal Ayisha Vs Bindhu Jayaprakasan