Ramla v. Lilly George
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court disposed of an original petition seeking to modify an order allowing amendment in a property suit. It ordered the trial court to consider the plea of limitation regarding recovery of possession and directed petitioners to file an additional written statement within 15 days.
What did the court decide?
This Original Petition is disposed of; petitioners directed to file additional written statement within 15 days.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. BADHARUDEEN
TUESDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF MAY 2022 / 3RD JYAISHTA, 1944
OP(C) NO.70 OF 2022
AGAINST THE COMMON ORDER IN I.A.NO.7694/2019 & I.A.No.1/2020 IN I.A.NO.7694/2019 ON THE FILE OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF COURT-II, ERNAKULAM
PETITIONERS/DEFENDANTS:
- 1 RAMLA, AGED 60 YEARS, W/O.MUHAMMED KUNJU, MANATH HOUSE, THRIKKAKKARA CENTURY LANE, KAKKANAD P.O, ERNAKULAM, PIN – 682 030.
- 2 MOHAMMED ANSARI, AGED 57 YEARS, KULIYANKAL HOUSE, NEAR COLLECTORATE, KAKKANAD P.O., ERNAKULAM, PIN – 682 030.
BY ADVS. K.M.SANAL
ANUP T PAUL
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the plea of limitation raised by defendants regarding amended relief for recovery of possession shall be considered by the trial court.
Whether to modify the order to preserve the right to claim limitation benefits under the doctrine of relation back.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
RAMLA
- petitioner
MOHAMMED ANSARI
- respondent
LILLY GEORGE
- respondent
LEAH SARA GEORGE
- respondent
LINJU GEORGE
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court