Dismissed
P.C.Chacko v. Palackal Timbers
Kerala HCOP(C)/697/2021
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. BADHARUDEEN
TUESDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF MAY 2022 / 3RD JYAISHTA, 1944
OP(C) NO. 697 OF 2021
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OS 175/2018 OF MUNSIFF COURT, ETTUMANOOR
CMA 96/2018 OF ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT & SESSIONS COURT - V, KOTTAYAM / III ADDITIONAL MACT, KOTTAYAM
PETITIONERS/APPELLANT:
1P.C.CHACKO
AGED 64 YEARS
S/O.CHACKO, CHALAPPALLIL HOUSE,
PEROOR VILLAGE, CHERUVANDOOR KARA,
ETTUMANOOR P.O., KOTTAYAM DISTRICT-686631.
2K.V.MATHEW,
AGED 66 YEARS
S/O. M.J.VARKEY, MANGATTU HOUSE,
PEROOR VILLAGE, CHERUVANDOOR KARA,
ETTUMANOOR P.O., KOTTAYAM DISTRICT-686631.
BY ADVS.
P.B.SAHASRANAMAN
T.S.HARIKUMAR
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS:
1PALACKAL TIMBERS
CHERUVANDOOR, PEROOR VILLAGE,
CHERUVANDOOR KARA, ETTUMANOOR P.O.,
KOTTAYAM DISTRICT,
REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR SHAMMY A. SAHIB,
AGED ABOUT 47, S/O.AHAMMED, PALAKKAL HOUSE,
PEROOR VILLAGE, CHERUVANDOOR KARA,
ETTUMANOOR P.O., KOTTAYAM DISTRICT-686631.
2SHAMMY A. SAHIB,
AGED 47 YEARS
S/O.AHAMMED, PALACKAL HOUSE, PEROOR VILLAGE,
CHERUVANDOOR KARA, ETTUMANOOR P.O.,
KOTTAYAM DISTRICT-686631.
BY ADV SRI.PRAVEEN K. JOY
THIS OP (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24.05.2022,
THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
OP(C) NO. 697 OF 2021
2
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 24th day of May, 2022
It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners
that the Original Petition is not pressed. Submission is recorded. Accordingly, this Original Petition stands dismissed as not pressed.
Sd/-
A. BADHARUDEEN
JUDGE
nkr
3
OP(C) NO. 697 OF 2021
APPENDIX OF OP(C) 697/2021
PETITIO |
NER |
EXHIBITS |
|---|---|---|
EXHIBIT |
P1 |
TRUE COPY OF THE PLAINT IN O.S.175 OF2018 ON THE FILE OF THE MUNSIFF'S COURTETTUMANOOR. |
EXHIBIT |
P2 |
THE TRUE COPY OF THE CIRCULAR BEARINGNO.PCB/T4/115/97 DATED 20.7.2011 OF THEKERALA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD. |
EXHIBIT |
P3 |
TRUE COPY OF I.A.1449 OF 2018 INO.S.175 OF 2018 ON THE FILE OF THEMUNSIFF'S COURT ETTUMANOOR. |
EXHIBIT |
P4 |
TRUE COPY OF THE OBJECTION FILED BYDEFENDANTS 1 AND 2 TO I.A.1449 OF 2018IN O.S.175 OF 2018 ON THE FILE OF THEMUNSIFF'S COURT ETTUMANOOR. |
EXHIBIT |
P5 |
TRUE COPY OF THE WRITTEN STATEMENTFILED BY DEFENDANTS 1 AND 2 IN O.S.175OF 2018 ON THE FILE OF THE MUNSIFF'SCOURT ETTUMANOOR. |
EXHIBIT |
P6 |
TRUE COPY OF THE PLAN AND COMMISSIONREPORT IN O.S.175 OF 2018 ON THE FILEOF THE MUNSIFF'S COURT ETTUMANOOR DATED11.10.2018. |
EXHIBIT |
P7 |
TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 7.11.2018IN I.A.1449 OF 2018 IN O.S.175 OF 2018ON THE FILE OF THE MUNSIFF'S COURTETTUMANOOR. |
EXHIBIT |
P8 |
TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED26.9.2019 IN C.M.A.NO.96 OF 2018 ON THEFILE OF THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGEKOTTAYAM. |
1P.C.CHACKO and 2K.V.MATHEW
1PALACKAL TIMBERS and 2SHAMMY A. SAIB
A. BADHARUDEEN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court