Dismissed
Maheshan.v v. Simmi.M
Kerala HCMat.Appeal/726/2020
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Appeal against Family Court judgment declaring gift deed void dismissed as appellants filed memo not intending to proceed.
What did the court decide?
Appeal dismissed as not pressed.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
¶2
PRESENT
¶3
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANIL K. NARENDRAN
¶4
&
¶5
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.G. AJITHKUMAR
¶6
FRIDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2022 / 27TH KARTHIKA,
¶7
1944
¶8
MAT.APPEAL NO.726OF 2020
¶9
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 24.02.2020 IN O.P.NO.445 OF
¶10
2019 ON THE FILES OF THE FAMILY COURT, THALASSERY
¶11
APPELLANTS:
¶12
1 MAHESHAN.V,
AGED 47 YEARS,
S/O CHANDRAN, SUPERINTENDENT, RTO OFFICE,
IRITTY, KANNUR, THALASSERY-670 661.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Maheshan.V
- appellant
Vadavathi Mineeja
- respondent
Simmi.M
Coram
AI extract
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court