Rasiq v. Nejmu
Case brief
What is this about?
In this matrimonial appeal seeking set-aside of a return of gold decree, the High Court of Kerala disposed of the appeal on mutual compromise. The parties settled their disputes amicably, recording that they aimed to resume cohabitation.
What did the court decide?
Matrimonial appeal disposed of on recording compromise; prior Family Court decree set aside.
What the court decided
wh': l tyo"`jJa,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKuliAM
PRESET
THE EloNouRABLE in. -USTlcH ANII, K.NARENDRZDi
&
THE HONouRABLE in. rusTlcE p.G. ArlTHKumR
FRIDAy, THE 25TH DAy OF NOvmDER 2o22 / 4" AGRAIIA]IANzi,
1944
RAT.APPEAL NO. 670 0F 2018
AGAINST THE ORDER/JIJD®ENT IN OP 579/2014 0F FAMIIIY
counT, TIRUR
a
AppEljLan / s :
RASIQ AGED 31 YEARS AGED 31 YEARS, S/O.ASSAINAR, UNNIYAPPANTEPURAKKAL, UNNIAL, NIRAMARUTHUR AMSOM DESOM, TIRUR TALUK,MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.REPRESENTED BY POWER OF ATTORNEY, JAMEELA,AGED 51 YEARS, UNNIYAPPANTEPURAKKAL, UNNIAL, NIRAMARUTHUR AMSOM DESOM, TIRUR TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the matrimonial appeal should be disposed of on mutual compromise and set aside decree.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
RASIQ
- appellant
ASSAINAR
- appellant
JAMEELA
- respondent
NEJMU
- respondent
AHAMMED NAJAD
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court