The Karnataka High Court dismissed the matrimonial appeal on the date of hearing as the appellants sought and obtained permission to withdraw the proceedings.
The matrimonial appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
&
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SOPHY THOMAS
MONDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF JULY 2022 / 13TH ASHADHA, 1944 MAT.APPEAL NO. 575 OF 2015
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OP 662/2011 OF FAMILY
COURT,ERNAKULAM
APPELLANTS:
1 BABUKUTTAN PILLAI, AGED 54 YEARS, S/O. LATE KUNJIKRISHNA PILLAI, AYINIKKATUVEEDU, KIDANGAYAM, NORTH MYNAGAPILLY, KARUNAGAPALLY, KOLLAM
NOW RESIDING AG SHOW VALLEY, WEST MORAKKALA, KUMARAPURAM, ERNAKULAM - 683 565.
2 K.VENUGOPAL, AGED 50 YEARS, S/O. LATE KUNJIKRISHNA PILLAI, AYINIKKATTUVEEDU, KIDANGAYAM, NORTH MYNAGAPILLY, KARUNAGAPALLY, KOLLAM.
BY ADV J.SHEEBA MARIAM
RESPONDENT:
ANITHA KESAVADAS, D/O. KESAVADAS, SRIVANI, PERANDOOR ROAD, KALOOR, KOCHI - 17.
BY ADV SHIBU JOSEPH
THIS MATRIMONIAL APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 04.07.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
MAT.APPEAL NO. 575 OF 2015
..2..
J U D G M E N T
A. Muhamed Mustaque, J
It is submitted that the parties resolved their dispute and the appellants do not want to prosecute the appeal. A memo also has been filed seeking permission to withdraw the appeal. Accordingly, this Mat. Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/-
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
JUDGE
Sd/-
SOPHY THOMAS
JUDGE
PR
BABUKUTTAN PILLAI
K.VENUGOPAL
ANITHA KESAVADAS
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
SOPHY THOMAS
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
