Allowed

Mahesh v. Satheedevi

Kerala HC1 Jul 2022Mat.Appeal/367/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This matrimonial appeal challenges an order dismissing an application to set aside an ex parte decree due to failure to satisfy a deposit condition. The High Court allowed the appeal, holding the condition of depositing the entire relief value was erroneous. It allowed the appeal upon payment of costs and remitted the matter to the Family Court.

What did the court decide?

The appeal was allowed; the appellant to pay cost of Rs.10,000/- to the respondent; parties directed to appear before the Family Court to dispose of the original petition.

Mahesh Vs Satheedevi — Matrimonial and Divorce | Kerala HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE

¶4

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SOPHY THOMAS

¶6

FRIDAY, THE 1^ST DAY OF JULY 2022 / 10TH ASHADHA, 1944

¶7

MAT.APPEAL NO.367 OF 2022

¶8

AGAINST THE ORDER IN IA 1178/2019 IN OP 534/2017 OF FAMILY COURT, PALAKKAD

¶9

APPELLANT/PETITIONER/RESPONDENT:

¶10

MAHESH AGED 43 YEARS S/O MARAVATTIKKAL GOPALAN EZHUTHASSAN, MARAVATTIKKAL (H), MULANKUNNATHUKAVU DESOM, KILLANNUR VILLAGE, TRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN-680581.

¶11

BY ADV LIJOY P.VARGHESE

¶12

RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT/PETITIONER:

¶13

SATHEEDEVI, AGED 34 YEARS D/O.KRISHNAN EZHUTHASSAN, KAVUNKAL (H), KAVALAPPARA DESOM, VITHINASSERY, NENMARA, CHITTOOR, PALAKKAD DISTRICT, PIN-678508.

¶14

THIS MATRIMONIAL APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 01.07.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶15

Mat.Appeal No.367 of 2022

¶16

¶17

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE & SOPHY THOMAS, JJ.

¶18

Mat. Appeal No.367 of 2022

¶19

Dated this the 1^st day of July, 2022

¶20

J U D G M E N T

¶21

A.Muhamed Mustaque, J.

¶22

This appeal is at the instance of the respondent in O.P No.534 of 2017 on the file of Family Court, Palakkad. The respondent herein approached the Family Court for recovery of gold ornaments and money from the appellant. The appellant was set ex parte in the proceedings. He filed an application to set aside the ex parte decree. That application was allowed on imposing conditions. The appellant has been directed to deposit the value of the relief granted besides payment of cost of Rs.2,500/- as a pre condition to set aside the ex parte decree. The appellant could not honour the conditions. Accordingly, the application was dismissed. These orders are under challenge before this Court.

¶23

¶24

Mat.Appeal No.367 of 2022

¶25

The Family Court having satisfied that there are sufficient grounds to set aside the ex parte decree, could not have imposed such a condition to set aside the ex parte decree. The relief granted was recovery of Rs.2,23,000/- along with interest. If the appellant is directed to deposit the entire value of the relief granted, it would cause serious hardship to him. If the court is of the opinion that the conduct of the appellant had resulted in setting him ex parte, that can very well be remedied by payment of cost.

¶26

In the facts and circumstances of the case, we are of the

¶27

view that, on payment of cost of Rs.10,000/-, the appeal can be allowed.

¶28

Accordingly, we allow this appeal. The appellant shall pay cost of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) to the respondent. Cost shall be paid to the respondent through the counsel appearing for the respondent in the Family Court, within a period of three weeks. The parties are directed to appear before the Family Court, Palakkad on 01.08.2022. Thereafter the Family Court shall dispose the original petition itself within a further period of two months.

¶29

Mat.Appeal No.367 of 2022

¶30

¶31

The petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment before the Family Court, Palakkad. The petitioner shall also serve a copy of this judgment on the counsel appearing for the respondent in the Family Court.

¶32

Sd/-

¶33

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE JUDGE

¶34

Sd/-

¶35

SOPHY THOMAS JUDGE

¶36

smp

¶37

Mat.Appeal No.367 of 2022

¶38

¶39

APPENDIX OF MAT.APPEAL 367/2022

¶40

PETITIONER ANNEXURES

¶41

Annexure 1 CERTIFIED COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 29.11.2021 IN PETITION TO SET ASIDE EXPARTE DECREE I.A.NO.1178/2019 IN O.P.NO.534/2017 OF THE HONOURABLE FAMILY COURT, PALAKKAD. Annexure 2 CERTIFIED COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 03.11.2021 IN PETITION TO SET ASIDE EXPARTE DECREE I.A.NO.1178/2019 IN O.P.NO.534/2017 OF THE HONOURABLE FAMILY COURT, PALAKKAD. Annexure 3 CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 20.05.2019 Annexure A4 CERTIFIED COPY OF THE DECREE DATED 20.05.2019.

¶42

RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES: NIL.

¶43

True Copy

¶44

P.S to Judge

¶45

smp

Mahesh v. Satheedevi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mahesh v. Satheedevi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sasankan R. Vs Salini

Arya T Vs Karthick

Nadine Vs Dr.Thomas

Sameer K Vs Febna

Unnikrishna Pillai Vs Pooja.S.R

A.v.Ummar Vs Janab T.K.Hamsa