The Karnataka High Court (sic) held that a subsequent fresh award rendered the appeal infructuous. The learned Judge perused the later award and closed the appeal without prejudice to the appellants' right to challenge the subsequent order.
The appeal is closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
MACA No.1727 of 2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS
MONDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF JANUARY 2022 / 20TH POUSHA, 1943
MACA NO. 1727 OF 2013
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OPMV 820/2011 OF MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL ,ERNAKULAM
APPELLANT/S:
RESPONDENT/S:
BY ADV SRI.M.PREMCHAND - R3
THIS MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10.01.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
2
MACA No.1727 of 2013
C.S.DIAS, J.
======================
MACA No.1727 of 2013
====================== Dated this the 10th day of January, 2022.
JUDGMENT
The appeal is filed against the award dated 27.4.2013 passed in OP(MV) No.820/2011 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal,Ernakulam.
I have perused the award dated 16.5.2015 and found that the submission made is correct. In the said circumstances, without prejudice to the right of the appellants to challenge the award dated 16.5.2015 in OP(MV) 820/2011, the appeal is closed.
SD/-
C.S.DIAS, JUDGE
sks/10.1.2022
OMANA PAVITHRAN, P.ANEESH, MS.ASHA
P.K.IBRAHIM, S.K.BABU, THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD.
C.S.DIAS
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
