Sunny v. Liza Antony
Case brief
What is this about?
The ACC appealed against the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal order filed in 2012. Proceeding with the hearing on 7 January 2022, the court dismissed the appeal for default due to lack of prosecution and failure to implead legal representatives.
What did the court decide?
The appeal was dismissed for default.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS
FRIDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF JANUARY 2022 / 17TH POUSHA, 1943
MACA NO. 2164 OF 2012
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN OP(MV) 715/2005 OF MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, IRINJALAKUDA
APPELLANT/PETITIONER:
SUNNY
S/O. JOSEPH,.ELANJIKKAL HOUSE, MUINGOOR DESOM & P.O. KALLUR VADAKKUMMURI VILLAGE, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK.
BY ADVS. SRI.P.V.BABY SRI.A.N.SANTHOSH
RESPONDENT/RESPONDENTS:
- 1 LIZA ANTONY
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Sunny
- respondent
Liza Antony
- respondent
Saseendran
- respondent
The United India Insurance Co Ltd.
- respondent
Buji Jose
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court