The High Court of Kerala disposed of a contempt case filed against respondent bank officials for non-compliance with writ discharge directions, holding the case closed once counsel confirmed compliance. Quality: thin.
Contempt case is closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY
FRIDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF AUGUST 2022 / 21ST SRAVANA, 1944
CON.CASE(C) NO. 993 OF 2022
ORDER DATED 18.03.2022 IN I.A. NO.2/2022 IN WP(C) 1919/2022 & JUDGMENT DATED 19.01.2022 IN W.P.(C) NO. 1919 OF 2022 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS IN THE WRIT PETITION:
S/O. PAULRAJ, PLAVILA HOUSE, ELAPPARA PO, ELAPPARA, IDUKKI DISTRICT , PIN – 685 501.
W/O. RAJAN P PAULRAJ, PLAVILA HOUSE, ELAPPARA PO, ELAPPARA, IDUKKI DISTRICT, PIN – 685 501.
BY ADV SIBI THOMAS JACOB
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS IN THE W.P.(C):
(FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONERS ), THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER, M/S. INDUSLND BANK LTD., 1ST FLOOR, JAIN TOWER II, NEAR RAILWAY OVER BRIDGE, NH BYEPASS, EDAPPALY, KOCHI, PIN – 682 024
(FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONERS ), BRANCH MANAGER, M/S. INDUSIND BANK LTD., GOURYA NARAYAN BUILDING, OPPOSITE TO JAYALAKSHMI SILKS, M.G. ROAD, ERNAKULAM , PIN – 682 011.
BY ADV VARGHESE C.KURIAKOSE
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12.08.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
C.O.(C) No. 993/2022
: 2 :
Dated this the 12th day of August, 2022.
JUDGMENT
This Contempt case is filed complaining that the directives
contained in the order dated 18.03.2022 in I.A. No. 2 of 2022 and the
judgment dated 19.01.2022 in W.P.(C) No. 1919 of 2022 are not complied with.
the amount as directed is remitted and the vehicle is released. Therefore, I do not find any reason to proceed with the contempt case any further.
Accordingly, this Contempt Case is closed.
sd/- SHAJI P. CHALY, JUDGE.
Rv
Rajan P. Paulraj
Mary Rajan
Rajendra Nath
Stebumon Baby
Shaji P. Chal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
